
Ryzen 5 8640HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 8640HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 105W, a 77W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,851 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌275% higher power demand at 105W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 8640HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 8640HS
2023Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 105W, a 77W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,851 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌275% higher power demand at 105W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 8640HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than Ryzen 5 8640HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 563 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 250 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 496 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 496 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 443 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 435 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 496 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 693 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 496 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 593 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 496 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 436 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 8640HS and Ryzen 7 5800X


Ryzen 5 8640HS
Ryzen 5 8640HS
The Ryzen 5 8640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,851 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 8640HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 5800X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640HS versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 4.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8640HS (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 8640HS uses the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 8640HS scores 19,851 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 33.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8640HS vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+4% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 32 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 19,851 | 27,712+40% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 8640HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 8640HS) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











