
Ryzen 5 8640HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 8640HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,851 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.2% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 8640HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 8640HS
2023Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.2% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,851 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 8640HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Ryzen 5 8640HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 428 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 242 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 496 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 496 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 538 FPS |
| ultra | 443 FPS | 470 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 435 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 275 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 496 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 496 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 555 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 496 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 396 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 8640HS and Ryzen 7 3700X


Ryzen 5 8640HS
Ryzen 5 8640HS
The Ryzen 5 8640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,851 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 8640HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640HS versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8640HS (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 8640HS uses the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 8640HS scores 19,851 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 12.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8640HS vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+11% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 32 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 19,851 | 22,430+13% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 8640HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











