Ryzen 5 8640HS vs Ryzen 5 PRO 230

AMD

Ryzen 5 8640HS

6 Cores12 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 230

6 Cores12 Thrd6 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2025

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 8640HS

2023

Why buy it

  • +0.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • 366.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 6W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 230 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 5 PRO 230

2025

Why buy it

  • Draws 6W instead of 28W, a 22W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Ryzen 5 8640HS needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (19,702 vs 19,851).
  • Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 8640HS better than Ryzen 5 PRO 230?
Yes. Ryzen 5 8640HS is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 0.7% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
For gaming, the two CPUs are effectively a wash in the available data.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 8640HS is the better fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 8640HS is the smarter buy by a wide margin for any fresh desktop build. Ryzen 5 8640HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 PRO 230 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop CPU, not because it is a serious desktop gaming option. It simply cannot keep up with modern games, especially when the gap is already 0.7% in the shared gaming data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 PRO 230 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 5 8640HSRyzen 5 PRO 230
1080p
low261 FPS265 FPS
medium237 FPS240 FPS
high199 FPS201 FPS
ultra171 FPS173 FPS
1440p
low230 FPS232 FPS
medium190 FPS191 FPS
high155 FPS156 FPS
ultra137 FPS138 FPS
4K
low159 FPS161 FPS
medium133 FPS134 FPS
high103 FPS104 FPS
ultra91 FPS92 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 5 8640HSRyzen 5 PRO 230
1080p
low372 FPS390 FPS
medium309 FPS323 FPS
high272 FPS286 FPS
ultra236 FPS250 FPS
1440p
low313 FPS328 FPS
medium270 FPS282 FPS
high244 FPS257 FPS
ultra207 FPS220 FPS
4K
low234 FPS246 FPS
medium206 FPS216 FPS
high191 FPS202 FPS
ultra161 FPS170 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 5 8640HSRyzen 5 PRO 230
1080p
low496 FPS493 FPS
medium496 FPS493 FPS
high496 FPS493 FPS
ultra496 FPS493 FPS
1440p
low496 FPS493 FPS
medium496 FPS493 FPS
high496 FPS493 FPS
ultra443 FPS439 FPS
4K
low493 FPS493 FPS
medium435 FPS434 FPS
high372 FPS370 FPS
ultra308 FPS305 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 5 8640HSRyzen 5 PRO 230
1080p
low496 FPS493 FPS
medium496 FPS493 FPS
high496 FPS493 FPS
ultra496 FPS493 FPS
1440p
low496 FPS493 FPS
medium496 FPS493 FPS
high496 FPS493 FPS
ultra496 FPS493 FPS
4K
low496 FPS493 FPS
medium496 FPS493 FPS
high442 FPS444 FPS
ultra380 FPS381 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 8640HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 230

AMD

Ryzen 5 8640HS

The Ryzen 5 8640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,851 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 230

The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,702 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 5 8640HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 230 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640HS versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 8640HS uses the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 8640HS scores 19,851 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 230's 19,702 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 8640HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8640HS vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 230.

FeatureRyzen 5 8640HSRyzen 5 PRO 230
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz
4.9 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
6 MB+500%
Process
4 nm
4 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025)
PassMark
19,851
19,702
Geekbench 6 Single
2,320
Geekbench 6 Multi
7,210
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 8640HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 uses FP7/FP7r2/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 8640HSRyzen 5 PRO 230
Socket
FP8
FP7/FP7r2/FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 8640HS) / AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen 5 PRO 230). The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Ryzen 5 8640HS requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureRyzen 5 8640HSRyzen 5 PRO 230
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 760M
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, AMD-Vi