
Ryzen 5 8640HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 230
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 8640HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌366.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 6W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 230 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 28W, a 22W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Ryzen 5 8640HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,702 vs 19,851).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen 5 8640HS
2023Ryzen 5 PRO 230
2025Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 28W, a 22W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Ryzen 5 8640HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌366.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 6W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 230 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,702 vs 19,851).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 8640HS better than Ryzen 5 PRO 230?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 390 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 250 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 328 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 220 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 170 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 496 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 496 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 443 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 435 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 305 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 496 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 496 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 496 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 444 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 381 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 8640HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 230


Ryzen 5 8640HS
Ryzen 5 8640HS
The Ryzen 5 8640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,851 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 PRO 230
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,702 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 8640HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 230 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640HS versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 8640HS uses the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 8640HS scores 19,851 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 230's 19,702 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 8640HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8640HS vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 230.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 6 MB+500% |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 19,851 | 19,702 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,320 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 7,210 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 8640HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 uses FP7/FP7r2/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | FP7/FP7r2/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 256 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 8640HS) / AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen 5 PRO 230). The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Ryzen 5 8640HS requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 5 PRO 230 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 760M |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V, AMD-Vi |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











