Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 5 8640HS

Intel

Core i9-11900H

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2021

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 8640HS

6 Cores12 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i9-11900H

2021

Why buy it

  • +0.8% higher PassMark.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 8640HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.
  • Older platform position on FCBGA1787 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 8640HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Ryzen 5 8640HS

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +11.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1787 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (19,851 vs 20,009).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 8640HS better than Core i9-11900H?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 5 8640HS is ahead with a 11.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-11900H pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Core i9-11900H also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-11900H is the better fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 8640HS still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen 5 8640HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 11.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 8640HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1787. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i9-11900HRyzen 5 8640HS
1080p
low247 FPS261 FPS
medium230 FPS237 FPS
high193 FPS199 FPS
ultra166 FPS171 FPS
1440p
low220 FPS230 FPS
medium185 FPS190 FPS
high150 FPS155 FPS
ultra133 FPS137 FPS
4K
low154 FPS159 FPS
medium131 FPS133 FPS
high101 FPS103 FPS
ultra89 FPS91 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i9-11900HRyzen 5 8640HS
1080p
low314 FPS371 FPS
medium267 FPS309 FPS
high226 FPS272 FPS
ultra206 FPS236 FPS
1440p
low259 FPS313 FPS
medium230 FPS270 FPS
high201 FPS244 FPS
ultra174 FPS207 FPS
4K
low160 FPS234 FPS
medium144 FPS206 FPS
high136 FPS191 FPS
ultra121 FPS161 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i9-11900HRyzen 5 8640HS
1080p
low500 FPS496 FPS
medium500 FPS496 FPS
high488 FPS496 FPS
ultra388 FPS496 FPS
1440p
low500 FPS496 FPS
medium500 FPS496 FPS
high426 FPS496 FPS
ultra345 FPS443 FPS
4K
low428 FPS493 FPS
medium368 FPS435 FPS
high324 FPS372 FPS
ultra259 FPS308 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i9-11900HRyzen 5 8640HS
1080p
low500 FPS496 FPS
medium500 FPS496 FPS
high500 FPS496 FPS
ultra500 FPS496 FPS
1440p
low500 FPS496 FPS
medium500 FPS496 FPS
high500 FPS496 FPS
ultra476 FPS496 FPS
4K
low500 FPS496 FPS
medium458 FPS496 FPS
high405 FPS442 FPS
ultra348 FPS380 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-11900H and Ryzen 5 8640HS

Intel

Core i9-11900H

The Core i9-11900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,009 points. Launch price was $546.

AMD

Ryzen 5 8640HS

The Ryzen 5 8640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,851 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i9-11900H packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 8640HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-11900H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i9-11900H versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640HS — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i9-11900H uses the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen 5 8640HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-11900H scores 20,009 against the Ryzen 5 8640HS's 19,851 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i9-11900H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-11900H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8640HS.

FeatureCore i9-11900HRyzen 5 8640HS
Cores / Threads
8 / 16+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz
4.9 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
3.5 GHz+67%
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)+50%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+25%
1 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm SuperFin
4 nm-60%
Architecture
Tiger Lake-H (2021)
Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
PassMark
20,009
19,851
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-11900H uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 8640HS uses FP8 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i9-11900HRyzen 5 8640HS
Socket
FCBGA1787
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0