
Core i7-1370P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 8640HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-1370P
2023Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe 96EU, while Ryzen 5 8640HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $438 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen 5 8640HS
2023Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,851 vs 19,993).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-1370P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-1370P
2023Ryzen 5 8640HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe 96EU, while Ryzen 5 8640HS needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $438 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,851 vs 19,993).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-1370P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-1370P better than Ryzen 5 8640HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-1370P | Ryzen 5 8640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-1370P | Ryzen 5 8640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 272 FPS |
| ultra | 232 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 271 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 161 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-1370P | Ryzen 5 8640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 462 FPS | 496 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 443 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 418 FPS | 435 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 308 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-1370P | Ryzen 5 8640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 500 FPS | 496 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 500 FPS | 496 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 469 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 417 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 380 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-1370P and Ryzen 5 8640HS

Core i7-1370P
Core i7-1370P
The Core i7-1370P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-P (2023) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 19,993 points. Launch price was $438.


Ryzen 5 8640HS
Ryzen 5 8640HS
The Ryzen 5 8640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,851 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-1370P packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 8640HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-1370P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-1370P versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640HS — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-1370P (base: 1.9 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-1370P uses the Raptor Lake-P (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 8640HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1370P scores 19,993 against the Ryzen 5 8640HS's 19,851 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-1370P. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-1370P vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8640HS.
| Feature | Core i7-1370P | Ryzen 5 8640HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+6% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.9 GHz | 3.5 GHz+84% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-P (2023) | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 19,993 | 19,851 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 13,200 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,095 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-1370P uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 8640HS uses FP8 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-1370P | Ryzen 5 8640HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-1370P) / not specified (Ryzen 5 8640HS). The Core i7-1370P includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe 96EU), while the Ryzen 5 8640HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1370P targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-1370P rivals Ryzen 7 7840U.
| Feature | Core i7-1370P | Ryzen 5 8640HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe 96EU | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











