
Core i7-1280P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 8640HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-1280P
2022Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 8640HS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $482 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen 5 8640HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.3% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,851 vs 20,043).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Core i7-1280P
2022Ryzen 5 8640HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.3% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 8640HS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $482 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,851 vs 20,043).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-1280P better than Ryzen 5 8640HS?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-1280P | Ryzen 5 8640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-1280P | Ryzen 5 8640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 272 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 177 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 161 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-1280P | Ryzen 5 8640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 501 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 462 FPS | 496 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 443 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 416 FPS | 435 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 314 FPS | 308 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-1280P | Ryzen 5 8640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 501 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 501 FPS | 496 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 501 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 496 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 469 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 380 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-1280P and Ryzen 5 8640HS

Core i7-1280P
Core i7-1280P
The Core i7-1280P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,043 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 8640HS
Ryzen 5 8640HS
The Ryzen 5 8640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,851 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-1280P packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 8640HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-1280P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-1280P versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640HS — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8640HS (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-1280P uses the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 8640HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1280P scores 20,043 against the Ryzen 5 8640HS's 19,851 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-1280P. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-1280P vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8640HS.
| Feature | Core i7-1280P | Ryzen 5 8640HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.9 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz+94% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-P (2022) | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 20,043 | 19,851 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-1280P uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 8640HS uses FP8 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-1280P | Ryzen 5 8640HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











