
Core i7-12700TE
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 8640HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-12700TE
2022Why buy it
- ✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 8640HS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,744 vs 19,851).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $378 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.
Ryzen 5 8640HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
Core i7-12700TE
2022Ryzen 5 8640HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 8640HS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,744 vs 19,851).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $378 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 8640HS better than Core i7-12700TE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700TE | Ryzen 5 8640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700TE | Ryzen 5 8640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 319 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 272 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 273 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 161 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-12700TE | Ryzen 5 8640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 494 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 494 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 494 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 448 FPS | 496 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 494 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 494 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 445 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 387 FPS | 443 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 450 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 435 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 266 FPS | 308 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-12700TE | Ryzen 5 8640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 494 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 494 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 494 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 494 FPS | 496 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 494 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 494 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 494 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 494 FPS | 496 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 494 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 380 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700TE and Ryzen 5 8640HS

Core i7-12700TE
Core i7-12700TE
The Core i7-12700TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 19,744 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 8640HS
Ryzen 5 8640HS
The Ryzen 5 8640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,851 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12700TE packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 8640HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-12700TE has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i7-12700TE versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640HS — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8640HS (base: 1.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-12700TE uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 8640HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700TE scores 19,744 against the Ryzen 5 8640HS's 19,851 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 8640HS. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700TE vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8640HS.
| Feature | Core i7-12700TE | Ryzen 5 8640HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 20+100% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.9 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 1.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz+150% |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total)+56% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 4 nm-60% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 19,744 | 19,851 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-12700TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 8640HS uses FP8 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-12700TE | Ryzen 5 8640HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











