Core i5-12500 vs Ryzen 5 8640HS

Intel

Core i5-12500

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 8640HS

6 Cores12 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12500

2022

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 8640HS needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 8640HS.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (19,739 vs 19,851).
  • Launch MSRP is still $212 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.

Ryzen 5 8640HS

2023

Why buy it

  • Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-12500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12500.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 8640HS better than Core i5-12500?
Yes. Ryzen 5 8640HS is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 1.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 8640HS is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 1.9% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 8640HS is the better fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 8640HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-12500 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 5 8640HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $212 MSRP, and it gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-12500 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (93.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 8640HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-12500Ryzen 5 8640HS
1080p
low186 FPS261 FPS
medium170 FPS237 FPS
high142 FPS199 FPS
ultra120 FPS171 FPS
1440p
low156 FPS230 FPS
medium133 FPS190 FPS
high107 FPS155 FPS
ultra90 FPS137 FPS
4K
low88 FPS159 FPS
medium81 FPS133 FPS
high65 FPS103 FPS
ultra50 FPS91 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-12500Ryzen 5 8640HS
1080p
low493 FPS371 FPS
medium428 FPS309 FPS
high362 FPS272 FPS
ultra319 FPS236 FPS
1440p
low433 FPS313 FPS
medium373 FPS270 FPS
high324 FPS244 FPS
ultra278 FPS207 FPS
4K
low289 FPS234 FPS
medium254 FPS206 FPS
high234 FPS191 FPS
ultra201 FPS161 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-12500Ryzen 5 8640HS
1080p
low493 FPS496 FPS
medium493 FPS496 FPS
high493 FPS496 FPS
ultra493 FPS496 FPS
1440p
low493 FPS496 FPS
medium493 FPS496 FPS
high491 FPS496 FPS
ultra440 FPS443 FPS
4K
low456 FPS493 FPS
medium401 FPS435 FPS
high345 FPS372 FPS
ultra281 FPS308 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-12500Ryzen 5 8640HS
1080p
low493 FPS496 FPS
medium493 FPS496 FPS
high493 FPS496 FPS
ultra493 FPS496 FPS
1440p
low493 FPS496 FPS
medium493 FPS496 FPS
high493 FPS496 FPS
ultra493 FPS496 FPS
4K
low493 FPS496 FPS
medium482 FPS496 FPS
high422 FPS442 FPS
ultra355 FPS380 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12500 and Ryzen 5 8640HS

Intel

Core i5-12500

The Core i5-12500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,739 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 5 8640HS

The Ryzen 5 8640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,851 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-12500 and Ryzen 5 8640HS share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-12500 versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640HS — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8640HS (base: 3 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-12500 uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 8640HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12500 scores 19,739 against the Ryzen 5 8640HS's 19,851 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 8640HS. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12500 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8640HS.

FeatureCore i5-12500Ryzen 5 8640HS
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
4.9 GHz+7%
Base Clock
3 GHz
3.5 GHz+17%
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)+13%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+25%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
PassMark
19,739
19,851
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,978
Geekbench 6 Single
2,319
Geekbench 6 Multi
9,003
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12500 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 8640HS uses FP8 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-12500Ryzen 5 8640HS
Socket
LGA1700
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-12500) / not specified (Ryzen 5 8640HS). The Core i5-12500 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 5 8640HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12500 targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-12500 rivals Ryzen 5 5500.

FeatureCore i5-12500Ryzen 5 8640HS
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Productivity