
Core i9-9900X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 8500G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-9900X
2018Why buy it
- ✅+50.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+20.3% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅214.3% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 14) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,459 vs 2,500).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 120.0 PassMark/$ ($989 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 8500G moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 8500G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 8500G
2024Why buy it
- ✅+71.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $810 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $989 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 448.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 120.0 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($179 MSRP vs $989 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,310 vs 13,985).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 19 MB).
Core i9-9900X
2018Ryzen 5 8500G
2024Why buy it
- ✅+50.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+20.3% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅214.3% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 14) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+71.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $810 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $989 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 448.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 120.0 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($179 MSRP vs $989 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,459 vs 2,500).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 120.0 PassMark/$ ($989 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 8500G moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 8500G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,310 vs 13,985).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 19 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 8500G better than Core i9-9900X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 8500G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 8500G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 279 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 384 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 279 FPS | 248 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 8500G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 537 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 537 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 537 FPS |
| ultra | 527 FPS | 537 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 537 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 537 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 441 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 293 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 8500G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 537 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 537 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 537 FPS |
| ultra | 541 FPS | 537 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 537 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 537 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 537 FPS |
| ultra | 541 FPS | 537 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 537 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 519 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 462 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 393 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-9900X and Ryzen 5 8500G

Core i9-9900X
Core i9-9900X
The Core i9-9900X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 21,655 points. Launch price was $989.


Ryzen 5 8500G
Ryzen 5 8500G
The Ryzen 5 8500G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,481 points. Launch price was $229.
Processing Power
The Core i9-9900X packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 8500G offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-9900X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i9-9900X versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8500G — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8500G (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i9-9900X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 8500G uses Phoenix2 (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9900X scores 21,655 against the Ryzen 5 8500G's 21,481 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i9-9900X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 13,985 vs 9,310 (40.1% advantage for the Core i9-9900X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,459 vs 2,500, a 52.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 8500G that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,475 vs 10,000 (5.4% advantage for the Ryzen 5 8500G). L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-9900X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8500G.
| Feature | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 8500G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 5 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB (total)+20% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Phoenix2 (2024) |
| PassMark | 21,655 | 21,481 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 13,985+50% | 9,310 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,459 | 2,500+71% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,475 | 10,000+6% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-9900X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 8500G uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i9-9900X versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 5 8500G — the Ryzen 5 8500G supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 8500G supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Core i9-9900X) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 8500G). PCIe lanes: 44 (Core i9-9900X) vs 14 (Ryzen 5 8500G) — the Core i9-9900X offers 30 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X299 (Core i9-9900X) and A620,B650,B650E,X670,X670E,B840,B850,X870,X870E (Ryzen 5 8500G).
| Feature | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 8500G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-5200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 44+214% | 14 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-9900X) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 8500G). The Ryzen 5 8500G includes integrated graphics (Radeon 740M), while the Core i9-9900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 8500G targets General Use. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 8500G rivals Core i5-13400.
| Feature | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 8500G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 740M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | General Use |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-9900X launched at $989 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 8500G debuted at $179. On MSRP ($989 vs $179), the Ryzen 5 8500G is $810 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-9900X delivers 21.9 pts/$ vs 120.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 8500G — making the Ryzen 5 8500G the 138.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 8500G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $989 | $179-82% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.9 | 120.0+448% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












