
Core i7-13800H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7645HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13800H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7645HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7645HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 7645HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Core i7-13800H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,097 vs 26,349).
Core i7-13800H
2023Ryzen 5 7645HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Core i7-13800H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7645HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7645HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,097 vs 26,349).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13800H better than Ryzen 5 7645HX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 5 7645HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 182 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 5 7645HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 638 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 515 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 430 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 468 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 335 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 273 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 236 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 5 7645HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 652 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 590 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 652 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 306 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 5 7645HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 659 FPS | 652 FPS |
| medium | 659 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 659 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 659 FPS | 652 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 659 FPS | 652 FPS |
| medium | 659 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 551 FPS | 570 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 586 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 393 FPS | 405 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13800H and Ryzen 5 7645HX

Core i7-13800H
Core i7-13800H
The Core i7-13800H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 26,349 points. Launch price was $457.


Ryzen 5 7645HX
Ryzen 5 7645HX
The Ryzen 5 7645HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Dragon Range (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,097 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13800H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7645HX offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-13800H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13800H versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7645HX — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-13800H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i7-13800H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7645HX uses Dragon Range (Zen4) (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13800H scores 26,349 against the Ryzen 5 7645HX's 26,097 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-13800H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13800H vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7645HX.
| Feature | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 5 7645HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+4% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 4 GHz+60% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Dragon Range (Zen4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 26,349 | 26,097 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 13,985 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,588 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,717 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13800H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7645HX uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 5 7645HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FL1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-13800H) / AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 5 7645HX). The Ryzen 5 7645HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Core i7-13800H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7645HX targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7645HX rivals Core i5-13500HX.
| Feature | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 5 7645HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 610M |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V (SVM) |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












