
Core i5-14500T
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7640HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-14500T
2024Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 7640HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7640HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,889 vs 22,921).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $232 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen 5 7640HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-14500T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-14500T
2024Ryzen 5 7640HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 7640HS needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7640HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,889 vs 22,921).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $232 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-14500T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7640HS better than Core i5-14500T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-14500T | Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 194 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-14500T | Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 312 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 313 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 376 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-14500T | Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 572 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 540 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 458 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 521 FPS |
| ultra | 412 FPS | 450 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 412 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 316 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-14500T | Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 572 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 572 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 572 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 555 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 483 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 513 FPS | 566 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 410 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 387 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-14500T and Ryzen 5 7640HS

Core i5-14500T
Core i5-14500T
The Core i5-14500T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,889 points. Launch price was $232.


Ryzen 5 7640HS
Ryzen 5 7640HS
The Ryzen 5 7640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,921 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-14500T packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7640HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-14500T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-14500T versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7640HS — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7640HS (base: 1.7 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i5-14500T uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7640HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14500T scores 22,889 against the Ryzen 5 7640HS's 22,921 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 7640HS. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-14500T vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7640HS.
| Feature | Core i5-14500T | Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 4.3 GHz+153% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 22,889 | 22,921 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,561 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-14500T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7640HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-14500T | Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-14500T) / not specified (Ryzen 5 7640HS). The Core i5-14500T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 5 7640HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-14500T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-14500T rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-14500T | Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Low Power Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











