
Core i9-10920X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7600X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-10920X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅83.3% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (12,000 vs 14,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 96 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.6 vs 86.0 PassMark/$ ($689 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 7600X3D
2024Why buy it
- ✅+16.7% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+398.7% larger total L3 cache (96 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $390 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $689 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 129.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 86.0 vs 37.6 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $689 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10920X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Core i9-10920X
2019Ryzen 5 7600X3D
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅83.3% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+16.7% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+398.7% larger total L3 cache (96 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $390 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $689 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 129.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 86.0 vs 37.6 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $689 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (12,000 vs 14,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 96 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.6 vs 86.0 PassMark/$ ($689 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10920X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7600X3D better than Core i9-10920X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 5 7600X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 5 7600X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 459 FPS | 462 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 345 FPS | 316 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 334 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 288 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 190 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 5 7600X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 616 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 643 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 643 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 522 FPS | 538 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 320 FPS | 339 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 5 7600X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 647 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 643 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 647 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 587 FPS | 643 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 609 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 574 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10920X and Ryzen 5 7600X3D

Core i9-10920X
Core i9-10920X
The Core i9-10920X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 25,875 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 7600X3D
Ryzen 5 7600X3D
The Ryzen 5 7600X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,723 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10920X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7600X3D offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-10920X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-10920X versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X3D — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-10920X (base: 3.5 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The Core i9-10920X uses the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7600X3D uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10920X scores 25,875 against the Ryzen 5 7600X3D's 25,723 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i9-10920X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,250 vs 2,800, a 76.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,000 vs 14,000 (15.4% advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X3D). L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-10920X vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X3D.
| Feature | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 5 7600X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+100% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+2% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.1 GHz+17% |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB (total) | 96 MB (total)+399% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake-X (2019) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 25,875 | 25,723 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,458 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,250 | 2,800+124% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,000 | 14,000+17% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10920X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 7600X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10920X versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 5 7600X3D — the Ryzen 5 7600X3D supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-10920X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Core i9-10920X) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 7600X3D). PCIe lanes: 44 (Core i9-10920X) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 7600X3D) — the Core i9-10920X offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X299 (Core i9-10920X) and B650,X670,B650E,X670E (Ryzen 5 7600X3D).
| Feature | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 5 7600X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR5-5200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+33% | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 44+83% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-10920X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-10920X) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X3D). The Ryzen 5 7600X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2 Cores)), while the Core i9-10920X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-10920X targets HEDT/Workstation, Ryzen 5 7600X3D targets Gaming.
| Feature | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 5 7600X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon Graphics (2 Cores) |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | HEDT/Workstation | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-10920X launched at $689 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 7600X3D debuted at $299. On MSRP ($689 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 7600X3D is $390 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10920X delivers 37.6 pts/$ vs 86.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 7600X3D — making the Ryzen 5 7600X3D the 78.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 5 7600X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $689 | $299-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.6 | 86.0+129% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












