
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7600X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $139 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 7600X3D.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X3D across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,783 vs 14,000).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 7600X3D
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +77.0% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2 Cores), while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌86.9% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Ryzen 5 7600X3D
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $139 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 7600X3D.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +77.0% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2 Cores), while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X3D across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,783 vs 14,000).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌86.9% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7600X3D better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 7600X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 7600X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 462 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 316 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 190 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 7600X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 643 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 643 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 538 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 339 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 7600X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 643 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 643 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 574 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 7600X3D

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.


Ryzen 5 7600X3D
Ryzen 5 7600X3D
The Ryzen 5 7600X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,723 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 7600X3D share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X3D — a 8.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X3D (base: 2.9 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7600X3D uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 5 7600X3D's 25,723 — a 65.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X3D. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 2,800, a 63.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 14,000 (83.1% advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X3D). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X3D.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 7600X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.7 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 4.1 GHz+41% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 96 MB (total)+700% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 25,723+97% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | 2,800+93% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | 14,000+142% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 7600X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 5 7600X3D — the Ryzen 5 7600X3D supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 7600X3D supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 7600X3D) — the Ryzen 5 7600X3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and B650,X670,B650E,X670E (Ryzen 5 7600X3D).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 7600X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-5200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 192 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen 5 7600X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X3D). The Ryzen 5 7600X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2 Cores)), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Ryzen 5 7600X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 7600X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon Graphics (2 Cores) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 7600X3D debuted at $299. On MSRP ($160 vs $299), the Core i5-10400F is $139 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 86.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 7600X3D — making the Ryzen 5 7600X3D the 5.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 7600X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160-46% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4 | 86.0+6% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











