PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 7600X

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,590 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
✅Delivers 516.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 350W, a 245W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Xeon w9-3495X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3495X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,300 vs 72,560).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w9-3495X, which brings 56 cores / 112 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.

Xeon w9-3495X

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 56 cores / 112 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 350W vs 105W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 5 7600X

2022

Xeon w9-3495X

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,590 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
✅Delivers 516.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 350W, a 245W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Xeon w9-3495X needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 56 cores / 112 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3495X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,300 vs 72,560).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w9-3495X, which brings 56 cores / 112 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 350W vs 105W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w9-3495X better than Ryzen 5 7600X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon w9-3495X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 7600X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w9-3495X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 20.4% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 105 MB vs 32 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w9-3495X is the better fit. You are getting 374.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 56 cores and 112 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 228.1% larger total L3 cache (105 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w9-3495X is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 7600X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon w9-3495X is 1869.6% more expensive on MSRP at $5,889 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it gives you a 20.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 7600X is also 516.8% better value on MSRP (94.7 vs 15.4 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w9-3495X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), 3D V-Cache and a much larger 105 MB L3 cache instead of 32 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 56 cores / 112 threads instead of 6/12. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 7600X Benchmark Check

Xeon w9-3495X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon w9-3495X
1080p
low	266 FPS	316 FPS
medium	246 FPS	306 FPS
high	210 FPS	246 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	207 FPS
1440p
low	226 FPS	274 FPS
medium	189 FPS	237 FPS
high	154 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	157 FPS
4K
low	157 FPS	186 FPS
medium	131 FPS	159 FPS
high	101 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	108 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Xeon w9-3495X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon w9-3495X
1080p
low	649 FPS	384 FPS
medium	524 FPS	332 FPS
high	436 FPS	270 FPS
ultra	386 FPS	236 FPS
1440p
low	544 FPS	308 FPS
medium	455 FPS	273 FPS
high	388 FPS	232 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	190 FPS
4K
low	341 FPS	181 FPS
medium	290 FPS	162 FPS
high	271 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	232 FPS	133 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Xeon w9-3495X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon w9-3495X
1080p
low	708 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	652 FPS	1086 FPS
high	571 FPS	1020 FPS
ultra	484 FPS	875 FPS
1440p
low	708 FPS	1009 FPS
medium	554 FPS	913 FPS
high	479 FPS	839 FPS
ultra	409 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	463 FPS	605 FPS
medium	392 FPS	521 FPS
high	341 FPS	465 FPS
ultra	281 FPS	400 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Xeon w9-3495X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon w9-3495X
1080p
low	708 FPS	1141 FPS
medium	708 FPS	1015 FPS
high	708 FPS	896 FPS
ultra	708 FPS	797 FPS
1440p
low	708 FPS	924 FPS
medium	708 FPS	809 FPS
high	658 FPS	712 FPS
ultra	571 FPS	625 FPS
4K
low	560 FPS	675 FPS
medium	502 FPS	602 FPS
high	452 FPS	540 FPS
ultra	391 FPS	437 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Xeon w9-3495X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7600X and Xeon w9-3495X

Ryzen 5 7600X

The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon w9-3495X

The Xeon w9-3495X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 105 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 90,441 points. Launch price was $5,889.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 7600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon w9-3495X offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the Xeon w9-3495X has 50 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3495X — a 9.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 4.7 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon w9-3495X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7600X scores 28,325 against the Xeon w9-3495X's 90,441 — a 104.6% lead for the Xeon w9-3495X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,300 vs 72,560 (130.3% advantage for the Xeon w9-3495X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,900 vs 2,136, a 30.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,800 vs 18,600 (29.6% advantage for the Xeon w9-3495X). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X vs 105 MB on the Xeon w9-3495X.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon w9-3495X
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	56 / 112+833%
Boost Clock	5.3 GHz+10%	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	4.7 GHz+147%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	105 MB+228%
L2 Cache	6 MB+200%	2 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	28,325	90,441+219%
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,300	72,560+374%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,900+36%	2,136
Geekbench 6 Multi	13,800	18,600+35%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w9-3495X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Xeon w9-3495X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs 8 (Xeon w9-3495X). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3495X) — the Xeon w9-3495X offers 84 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X) and W790 (Xeon w9-3495X).

Feature	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon w9-3495X
Socket	AM5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	4096 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	112+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs true (Xeon w9-3495X). The Ryzen 5 7600X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Xeon w9-3495X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming, Xeon w9-3495X targets Ultimate Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K; Xeon w9-3495X rivals Threadripper PRO 7995WX.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon w9-3495X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	true
Target Use	Gaming	Ultimate Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 5 7600X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon w9-3495X debuted at $5889. On MSRP ($299 vs $5889), the Ryzen 5 7600X is $5590 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 7600X delivers 94.7 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3495X — making the Ryzen 5 7600X the 144.2% better value option.