PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 7600X

2022

Why buy it

✅+59.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $4,652 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
✅Delivers 693.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 11.9 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 270W, a 165W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (13,800 vs 17,713).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 57 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3375, which brings 38 cores / 76 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-3375

2021

Why buy it

✅+28.4% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+78.1% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 38 cores / 76 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,818 vs 2,900).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($4,951 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌157.1% higher power demand at 270W vs 105W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 5 7600X

2022

Xeon W-3375

2021

Why buy it

✅+59.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $4,652 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
✅Delivers 693.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 11.9 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 270W, a 165W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+28.4% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+78.1% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 38 cores / 76 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (13,800 vs 17,713).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 57 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3375, which brings 38 cores / 76 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,818 vs 2,900).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($4,951 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌157.1% higher power demand at 270W vs 105W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 7600X better than Xeon W-3375?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-3375 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 7600X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3375 is the better fit. You are getting 28.4% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 38 cores and 76 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 78.1% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 7600X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 5 7600X is $4,652 cheaper on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $4,951 MSRP, and it gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 45 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon W-3375 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 28.4% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 693.7% better value on MSRP (94.7 vs 11.9 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 7600X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 7600X Benchmark Check

Xeon W-3375 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-3375
1080p
low	266 FPS	191 FPS
medium	246 FPS	154 FPS
high	210 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	226 FPS	157 FPS
medium	189 FPS	123 FPS
high	154 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	157 FPS	72 FPS
medium	131 FPS	60 FPS
high	101 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	39 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Xeon W-3375

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-3375
1080p
low	649 FPS	496 FPS
medium	524 FPS	431 FPS
high	436 FPS	345 FPS
ultra	386 FPS	286 FPS
1440p
low	544 FPS	425 FPS
medium	455 FPS	375 FPS
high	388 FPS	310 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	247 FPS
4K
low	341 FPS	264 FPS
medium	290 FPS	237 FPS
high	271 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	232 FPS	174 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Xeon W-3375

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-3375
1080p
low	708 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	652 FPS	937 FPS
high	571 FPS	880 FPS
ultra	484 FPS	796 FPS
1440p
low	708 FPS	799 FPS
medium	554 FPS	710 FPS
high	479 FPS	667 FPS
ultra	409 FPS	597 FPS
4K
low	463 FPS	514 FPS
medium	392 FPS	424 FPS
high	341 FPS	372 FPS
ultra	281 FPS	305 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Xeon W-3375

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-3375
1080p
low	708 FPS	932 FPS
medium	708 FPS	847 FPS
high	708 FPS	732 FPS
ultra	708 FPS	633 FPS
1440p
low	708 FPS	732 FPS
medium	708 FPS	644 FPS
high	658 FPS	554 FPS
ultra	571 FPS	480 FPS
4K
low	560 FPS	532 FPS
medium	502 FPS	476 FPS
high	452 FPS	419 FPS
ultra	391 FPS	360 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Xeon W-3375

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7600X and Xeon W-3375

Ryzen 5 7600X

The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-3375

The Xeon W-3375 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-07-29. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,091 points. Launch price was $4,499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 7600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-3375 offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon W-3375 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3375 — a 28% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 4.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon W-3375 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7600X scores 28,325 against the Xeon W-3375's 59,091 — a 70.4% lead for the Xeon W-3375. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,900 vs 1,818, a 45.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,800 vs 17,713 (24.8% advantage for the Xeon W-3375). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3375.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-3375
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	38 / 76+533%
Boost Clock	5.3 GHz+32%	4 GHz
Base Clock	4.7 GHz+88%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	57 MB (total)+78%
L2 Cache	6 MB+500%	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-50%	10 nm
Architecture	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)	Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark	28,325	59,091+109%
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,300	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,900+60%	1,818
Geekbench 6 Multi	13,800	17,713+28%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3375 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 5 7600X versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon W-3375 — the Ryzen 5 7600X supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3375 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs 8 (Xeon W-3375). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs 64 (Xeon W-3375) — the Xeon W-3375 offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X) and Intel C621A (Xeon W-3375).

Feature	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-3375
Socket	AM5	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	4096 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	64+129%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 7600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs true (Xeon W-3375). The Ryzen 5 7600X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Xeon W-3375 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K; Xeon W-3375 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-3375
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	true
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 5 7600X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3375 debuted at $4951. On MSRP ($299 vs $4951), the Ryzen 5 7600X is $4652 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 7600X delivers 94.7 pts/$ vs 11.9 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3375 — making the Ryzen 5 7600X the 155.2% better value option.