PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 7600X

2022

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Costs $1,131 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,430 MSRP).
✅Delivers 244.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 27.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,430 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 250W, a 145W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (28,325 vs 39,293).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3335, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-3335

2021

Why buy it

✅+38.7% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($1,430 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌138.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 105W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 5 7600X

2022

Xeon W-3335

2021

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Costs $1,131 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,430 MSRP).
✅Delivers 244.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 27.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,430 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 250W, a 145W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+38.7% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (28,325 vs 39,293).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3335, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($1,430 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌138.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 105W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 7600X better than Xeon W-3335?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-3335 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 7600X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3335 is the better fit. You are getting 38.7% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 7600X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 5 7600X is $1,131 cheaper on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $1,430 MSRP, and it gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 41 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon W-3335 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 38.7% better PassMark. It is also 244.8% better value on MSRP (94.7 vs 27.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 7600X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 7600X Benchmark Check

Xeon W-3335 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-3335
1080p
low	266 FPS	182 FPS
medium	246 FPS	144 FPS
high	210 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	92 FPS
1440p
low	226 FPS	148 FPS
medium	189 FPS	115 FPS
high	154 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	157 FPS	68 FPS
medium	131 FPS	57 FPS
high	101 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	36 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Xeon W-3335

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-3335
1080p
low	649 FPS	447 FPS
medium	524 FPS	385 FPS
high	436 FPS	316 FPS
ultra	386 FPS	266 FPS
1440p
low	544 FPS	385 FPS
medium	455 FPS	342 FPS
high	388 FPS	287 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	237 FPS
4K
low	341 FPS	248 FPS
medium	290 FPS	223 FPS
high	271 FPS	199 FPS
ultra	232 FPS	165 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Xeon W-3335

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-3335
1080p
low	708 FPS	982 FPS
medium	652 FPS	962 FPS
high	571 FPS	905 FPS
ultra	484 FPS	819 FPS
1440p
low	708 FPS	836 FPS
medium	554 FPS	736 FPS
high	479 FPS	692 FPS
ultra	409 FPS	618 FPS
4K
low	463 FPS	537 FPS
medium	392 FPS	438 FPS
high	341 FPS	386 FPS
ultra	281 FPS	315 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Xeon W-3335

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-3335
1080p
low	708 FPS	982 FPS
medium	708 FPS	868 FPS
high	708 FPS	751 FPS
ultra	708 FPS	639 FPS
1440p
low	708 FPS	790 FPS
medium	708 FPS	676 FPS
high	658 FPS	582 FPS
ultra	571 FPS	496 FPS
4K
low	560 FPS	550 FPS
medium	502 FPS	480 FPS
high	452 FPS	429 FPS
ultra	391 FPS	363 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Xeon W-3335

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7600X and Xeon W-3335

Ryzen 5 7600X

The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-3335

The Xeon W-3335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 39,293 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 7600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-3335 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon W-3335 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3335 — a 28% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 4.7 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon W-3335 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7600X scores 28,325 against the Xeon W-3335's 39,293 — a 32.4% lead for the Xeon W-3335. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3335.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-3335
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	16 / 32+167%
Boost Clock	5.3 GHz+32%	4 GHz
Base Clock	4.7 GHz+38%	3.4 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+33%	24 MB (total)
L2 Cache	6 MB+500%	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-50%	10 nm
Architecture	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)	Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark	28,325	39,293+39%
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,300	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,900	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	13,800	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3335 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 5 7600X versus 3200 on the Xeon W-3335 — the Xeon W-3335 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3335 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs 8 (Xeon W-3335). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs 64 (Xeon W-3335) — the Xeon W-3335 offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X) and W790 (Xeon W-3335).

Feature	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-3335
Socket	AM5	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200	3200+63900%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+3276700%	4096
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	64+129%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 7600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3335). The Ryzen 5 7600X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Xeon W-3335 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K; Xeon W-3335 rivals EPYC 7402.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-3335
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 5 7600X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3335 debuted at $1430. On MSRP ($299 vs $1430), the Ryzen 5 7600X is $1131 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 7600X delivers 94.7 pts/$ vs 27.5 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3335 — making the Ryzen 5 7600X the 110.1% better value option.