PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 7600X

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,150 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $4,449 MSRP).
✅Delivers 942.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 9.1 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $4,449 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 205W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Xeon W-3275M needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3275M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (28,325 vs 40,419).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 39 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3275M, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-3275M

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+20.3% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($4,449 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌95.2% higher power demand at 205W vs 105W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 5 7600X

2022

Xeon W-3275M

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,150 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $4,449 MSRP).
✅Delivers 942.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 9.1 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $4,449 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 205W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Xeon W-3275M needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+20.3% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3275M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (28,325 vs 40,419).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 39 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3275M, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($4,449 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌95.2% higher power demand at 205W vs 105W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3275M better than Ryzen 5 7600X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-3275M makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 7600X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-3275M is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 12.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3275M is the better fit. You are getting 42.7% better PassMark, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 20.3% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3275M is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 7600X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon W-3275M is 1388.0% more expensive on MSRP at $4,449 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it gives you a 12.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 7600X is also 942.7% better value on MSRP (94.7 vs 9.1 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 7600X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 7600X Benchmark Check

Xeon W-3275M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-3275M
1080p
low	266 FPS	198 FPS
medium	246 FPS	162 FPS
high	210 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	226 FPS	159 FPS
medium	189 FPS	125 FPS
high	154 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	157 FPS	87 FPS
medium	131 FPS	74 FPS
high	101 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	47 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Xeon W-3275M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-3275M
1080p
low	649 FPS	607 FPS
medium	524 FPS	522 FPS
high	436 FPS	420 FPS
ultra	386 FPS	371 FPS
1440p
low	544 FPS	514 FPS
medium	455 FPS	447 FPS
high	388 FPS	370 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	306 FPS
4K
low	341 FPS	306 FPS
medium	290 FPS	266 FPS
high	271 FPS	243 FPS
ultra	232 FPS	213 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Xeon W-3275M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-3275M
1080p
low	708 FPS	1010 FPS
medium	652 FPS	928 FPS
high	571 FPS	876 FPS
ultra	484 FPS	793 FPS
1440p
low	708 FPS	808 FPS
medium	554 FPS	715 FPS
high	479 FPS	675 FPS
ultra	409 FPS	605 FPS
4K
low	463 FPS	519 FPS
medium	392 FPS	429 FPS
high	341 FPS	387 FPS
ultra	281 FPS	315 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Xeon W-3275M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-3275M
1080p
low	708 FPS	1010 FPS
medium	708 FPS	1010 FPS
high	708 FPS	885 FPS
ultra	708 FPS	773 FPS
1440p
low	708 FPS	932 FPS
medium	708 FPS	804 FPS
high	658 FPS	702 FPS
ultra	571 FPS	603 FPS
4K
low	560 FPS	680 FPS
medium	502 FPS	591 FPS
high	452 FPS	521 FPS
ultra	391 FPS	437 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Xeon W-3275M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7600X and Xeon W-3275M

Ryzen 5 7600X

The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-3275M

The Xeon W-3275M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 40,419 points. Launch price was $7,453.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 7600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-3275M offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon W-3275M has 22 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3275M — a 14.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 4.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon W-3275M uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7600X scores 28,325 against the Xeon W-3275M's 40,419 — a 35.2% lead for the Xeon W-3275M. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X vs 38.5 MB on the Xeon W-3275M.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-3275M
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	28 / 56+367%
Boost Clock	5.3 GHz+15%	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	4.7 GHz+88%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	38.5 MB+20%
L2 Cache	6 MB	28 MB+367%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-64%	14 nm
Architecture	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	28,325	40,419+43%
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,300	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,900	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	13,800	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3275M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 5 7600X versus 2933 on the Xeon W-3275M — the Xeon W-3275M supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3275M supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs 6 (Xeon W-3275M). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs 64 (Xeon W-3275M) — the Xeon W-3275M offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X) and C620 (Xeon W-3275M).

Feature	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-3275M
Socket	AM5	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200	2933+58560%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+6553500%	2048
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	64+129%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 7600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3275M). The Ryzen 5 7600X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Xeon W-3275M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K; Xeon W-3275M rivals EPYC 7742.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-3275M
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 5 7600X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3275M debuted at $4449. On MSRP ($299 vs $4449), the Ryzen 5 7600X is $4150 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 7600X delivers 94.7 pts/$ vs 9.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3275M — making the Ryzen 5 7600X the 165% better value option.