PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 7600X

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Costs $195 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $494 MSRP).
✅Delivers 95.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 48.4 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $494 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1390, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
❌31.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 80W.

Xeon W-1390

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
✅Draws 80W instead of 105W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (23,902 vs 28,325).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 48.4 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($494 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Ryzen 5 7600X

2022

Xeon W-1390

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Costs $195 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $494 MSRP).
✅Delivers 95.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 48.4 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $494 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
✅Draws 80W instead of 105W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1390, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
❌31.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 80W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (23,902 vs 28,325).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 48.4 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($494 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 7600X better than Xeon W-1390?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-1390 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 7600X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 7600X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 23.0% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 7600X is the better fit. You are getting 18.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 7600X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 5 7600X is $195 cheaper on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $494 MSRP, and it gives you a 23.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 95.8% better value on MSRP (94.7 vs 48.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 7600X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB), more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 7600X Benchmark Check

Xeon W-1390 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-1390
1080p
low	266 FPS	246 FPS
medium	246 FPS	231 FPS
high	210 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	165 FPS
1440p
low	226 FPS	217 FPS
medium	189 FPS	184 FPS
high	154 FPS	148 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	130 FPS
4K
low	157 FPS	151 FPS
medium	131 FPS	128 FPS
high	101 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	86 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Xeon W-1390

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-1390
1080p
low	649 FPS	406 FPS
medium	524 FPS	343 FPS
high	436 FPS	306 FPS
ultra	386 FPS	274 FPS
1440p
low	544 FPS	363 FPS
medium	455 FPS	315 FPS
high	388 FPS	278 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	239 FPS
4K
low	341 FPS	241 FPS
medium	290 FPS	216 FPS
high	271 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	232 FPS	176 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Xeon W-1390

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-1390
1080p
low	708 FPS	598 FPS
medium	652 FPS	527 FPS
high	571 FPS	453 FPS
ultra	484 FPS	391 FPS
1440p
low	708 FPS	590 FPS
medium	554 FPS	490 FPS
high	479 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	409 FPS	361 FPS
4K
low	463 FPS	421 FPS
medium	392 FPS	365 FPS
high	341 FPS	325 FPS
ultra	281 FPS	276 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Xeon W-1390

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-1390
1080p
low	708 FPS	598 FPS
medium	708 FPS	598 FPS
high	708 FPS	598 FPS
ultra	708 FPS	598 FPS
1440p
low	708 FPS	598 FPS
medium	708 FPS	598 FPS
high	658 FPS	598 FPS
ultra	571 FPS	552 FPS
4K
low	560 FPS	558 FPS
medium	502 FPS	506 FPS
high	452 FPS	452 FPS
ultra	391 FPS	393 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Xeon W-1390

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7600X and Xeon W-1390

Ryzen 5 7600X

The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-1390

The Xeon W-1390 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,902 points. Launch price was $494.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 7600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-1390 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon W-1390 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1390 — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 4.7 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon W-1390 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7600X scores 28,325 against the Xeon W-1390's 23,902 — a 16.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1390.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-1390
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	5.3 GHz+4%	5.1 GHz
Base Clock	4.7 GHz+68%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+100%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	6 MB+1100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-64%	14 nm
Architecture	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)	Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark	28,325+19%	23,902
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,300	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,900	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	13,800	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-1390 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-1390
Socket	AM5	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	28	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X) / not specified (Xeon W-1390). The Ryzen 5 7600X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Xeon W-1390 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon W-1390
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 5 7600X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon W-1390 debuted at $494. On MSRP ($299 vs $494), the Ryzen 5 7600X is $195 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 7600X delivers 94.7 pts/$ vs 48.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1390 — making the Ryzen 5 7600X the 64.8% better value option.