PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 7600X

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.5% higher average FPS across 13 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 105W instead of 245W, a 140W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Xeon Phi 7290 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Phi 7290, which brings 72 cores / 288 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon Phi 7290 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Phi 7290

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 72 cores / 288 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 13 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (17,839 vs 28,325).
❌133.3% higher power demand at 245W vs 105W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 5 7600X

2022

Xeon Phi 7290

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.5% higher average FPS across 13 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 105W instead of 245W, a 140W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Xeon Phi 7290 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 72 cores / 288 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Phi 7290, which brings 72 cores / 288 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon Phi 7290 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 13 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (17,839 vs 28,325).
❌133.3% higher power demand at 245W vs 105W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 7600X better than Xeon Phi 7290?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Phi 7290 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 7600X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 7600X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 24.5% more average FPS across 13 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 7600X is the better fit. You are getting 58.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 7600X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 5 7600X is at an unclear MSRP at $299 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 24.5% average FPS lead across 13 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (94.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 7600X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 72/288, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 7600X Benchmark Check

Xeon Phi 7290 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon Phi 7290
1080p
low	266 FPS	177 FPS
medium	246 FPS	143 FPS
high	210 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	88 FPS
1440p
low	226 FPS	141 FPS
medium	189 FPS	111 FPS
high	154 FPS	87 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	68 FPS
4K
low	157 FPS	66 FPS
medium	131 FPS	56 FPS
high	101 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	34 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Xeon Phi 7290

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon Phi 7290
1080p
low	649 FPS	136 FPS
medium	524 FPS	120 FPS
high	436 FPS	109 FPS
ultra	386 FPS	86 FPS
1440p
low	544 FPS	120 FPS
medium	455 FPS	108 FPS
high	388 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	341 FPS	87 FPS
medium	290 FPS	81 FPS
high	271 FPS	72 FPS
ultra	232 FPS	56 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Xeon Phi 7290

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon Phi 7290
1080p
low	708 FPS	446 FPS
medium	652 FPS	446 FPS
high	571 FPS	446 FPS
ultra	484 FPS	446 FPS
1440p
low	708 FPS	446 FPS
medium	554 FPS	434 FPS
high	479 FPS	374 FPS
ultra	409 FPS	326 FPS
4K
low	463 FPS	394 FPS
medium	392 FPS	306 FPS
high	341 FPS	259 FPS
ultra	281 FPS	209 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Xeon Phi 7290

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon Phi 7290
1080p
low	708 FPS	446 FPS
medium	708 FPS	446 FPS
high	708 FPS	446 FPS
ultra	708 FPS	446 FPS
1440p
low	708 FPS	446 FPS
medium	708 FPS	446 FPS
high	658 FPS	446 FPS
ultra	571 FPS	420 FPS
4K
low	560 FPS	446 FPS
medium	502 FPS	405 FPS
high	452 FPS	361 FPS
ultra	391 FPS	310 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Xeon Phi 7290

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7600X and Xeon Phi 7290

Ryzen 5 7600X

The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Phi 7290

The Xeon Phi 7290 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Knights Landing (2016) architecture. It features 72 cores and 288 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 245 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,839 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 7600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Phi 7290 offers 72 cores / 288 threads — the Xeon Phi 7290 has 66 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon Phi 7290 — a 102.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 4.7 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses Knights Landing (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7600X scores 28,325 against the Xeon Phi 7290's 17,839 — a 45.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X vs 0 kB (total) on the Xeon Phi 7290.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon Phi 7290
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	72 / 288+1100%
Boost Clock	5.3 GHz+212%	1.7 GHz
Base Clock	4.7 GHz+213%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	0 kB (total)
L2 Cache	6 MB+1100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-64%	14 nm
Architecture	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)	Knights Landing (2016)
PassMark	28,325+59%	17,839
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,300	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,900	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	13,800	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7600X	Xeon Phi 7290
Socket	AM5	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	28	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X) / not specified (Xeon Phi 7290). The Ryzen 5 7600X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Xeon Phi 7290 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.