
Ryzen 5 7600X
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2699 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,816 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $4,115 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1477.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $4,115 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 145W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 55 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699 v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-2699 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅42.9% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,711 vs 28,325).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($4,115 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌38.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 105W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Xeon E5-2699 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,816 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $4,115 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1477.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $4,115 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 145W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅42.9% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 55 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699 v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,711 vs 28,325).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($4,115 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌38.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 105W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7600X better than Xeon E5-2699 v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Xeon E5-2699 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Xeon E5-2699 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 524 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 455 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 388 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 271 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 232 FPS | 74 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Xeon E5-2699 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 652 FPS | 618 FPS |
| high | 571 FPS | 618 FPS |
| ultra | 484 FPS | 618 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 554 FPS | 618 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 590 FPS |
| ultra | 409 FPS | 532 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 463 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 382 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 281 FPS | 289 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Xeon E5-2699 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 708 FPS | 618 FPS |
| high | 708 FPS | 618 FPS |
| ultra | 708 FPS | 614 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 708 FPS | 618 FPS |
| high | 658 FPS | 572 FPS |
| ultra | 571 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 502 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 391 FPS | 373 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7600X and Xeon E5-2699 v4


Ryzen 5 7600X
Ryzen 5 7600X
The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2699 v4
Xeon E5-2699 v4
The Xeon E5-2699 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB. L2 cache: 5.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,711 points. Launch price was $4,115.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2699 v4 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon E5-2699 v4 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2699 v4 — a 38.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 4.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon E5-2699 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7600X scores 28,325 against the Xeon E5-2699 v4's 24,711 — a 13.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X vs 55 MB on the Xeon E5-2699 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Xeon E5-2699 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 22 / 44+267% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+47% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.7 GHz+114% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 55 MB+72% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+9% | 5.5 MB |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-64% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 28,325+15% | 24,711 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,300 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,900 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,800 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2699 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 5 7600X versus 2400 on the Xeon E5-2699 v4 — the Xeon E5-2699 v4 supports 199.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2699 v4 supports up to 1536 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2699 v4). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2699 v4) — the Xeon E5-2699 v4 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X) and C612 (Xeon E5-2699 v4).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Xeon E5-2699 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | 2400+47900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+8738033% | 1536 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 40+43% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 7600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 5 7600X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2699 v4). The Ryzen 5 7600X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Xeon E5-2699 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K; Xeon E5-2699 v4 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Xeon E5-2699 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 7600X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2699 v4 debuted at $4115. On MSRP ($299 vs $4115), the Ryzen 5 7600X is $3816 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 7600X delivers 94.7 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2699 v4 — making the Ryzen 5 7600X the 176.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Xeon E5-2699 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-93% | $4115 |
| Performance per Dollar | 94.7+1478% | 6.0 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












