
Ryzen 5 7600X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $850 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- β Delivers 225.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 29.1 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- β Draws 105W instead of 280W, a 175W reduction.
- β Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,300 vs 18,500).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
2020Why buy it
- β +20.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- β 357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 29.1 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($1,149 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- β166.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 105W.
- βOlder platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $850 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- β Delivers 225.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 29.1 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- β Draws 105W instead of 280W, a 175W reduction.
- β Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- β +20.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- β 357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,300 vs 18,500).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 29.1 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($1,149 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- β166.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 105W.
- βOlder platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7600X better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 557 FPS |
| medium | 524 FPS | 485 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 351 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 478 FPS |
| medium | 455 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 388 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 296 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 271 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 232 FPS | 217 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 772 FPS |
| medium | 652 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 571 FPS | 568 FPS |
| ultra | 484 FPS | 494 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 599 FPS |
| medium | 554 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 409 FPS | 376 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 463 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 344 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 281 FPS | 243 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 836 FPS |
| medium | 708 FPS | 836 FPS |
| high | 708 FPS | 823 FPS |
| ultra | 708 FPS | 725 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 836 FPS |
| medium | 708 FPS | 745 FPS |
| high | 658 FPS | 630 FPS |
| ultra | 571 FPS | 540 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 594 FPS |
| medium | 502 FPS | 540 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 468 FPS |
| ultra | 391 FPS | 405 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7600X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX


Ryzen 5 7600X
Ryzen 5 7600X
The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Castle Peak (2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 33,455 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX offers 12 cores / 24 threads β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX β a 20.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 4.7 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX uses Castle Peak (2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7600X scores 28,325 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX's 33,455 β a 16.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,300 vs 18,500 (18.9% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX). Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 2,900 vs 1,652, a 54.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,800 vs 11,500 (18.2% advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+23% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.7 GHz+18% | 4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 64 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+1100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) | Castle Peak (2020) |
| PassMark | 28,325 | 33,455+18% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,300 | 18,500+21% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,900+76% | 1,652 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,800+20% | 11,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 5 7600X versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX β the Ryzen 5 7600X supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX) β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 5 7600X supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The Ryzen 5 7600X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX rivals Xeon w5-2455X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) | β |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 7600X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX debuted at $1149. On MSRP ($299 vs $1149), the Ryzen 5 7600X is $850 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 7600X delivers 94.7 pts/$ vs 29.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX β making the Ryzen 5 7600X the 106% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-74% | $1149 |
| Performance per Dollar | 94.7+225% | 29.1 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












