
Ryzen 5 7600X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7640U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Ryzen 5 7640U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7640U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
Ryzen 5 7640U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,856 vs 28,325).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Ryzen 5 7640U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Ryzen 5 7640U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7640U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,856 vs 28,325).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7600X better than Ryzen 5 7640U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 5 7640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 5 7640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 524 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 272 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 455 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 388 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 271 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 232 FPS | 161 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 5 7640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 521 FPS |
| medium | 652 FPS | 521 FPS |
| high | 571 FPS | 521 FPS |
| ultra | 484 FPS | 521 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 521 FPS |
| medium | 554 FPS | 521 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 409 FPS | 443 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 463 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 435 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 281 FPS | 308 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 5 7640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 521 FPS |
| medium | 708 FPS | 521 FPS |
| high | 708 FPS | 521 FPS |
| ultra | 708 FPS | 521 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 521 FPS |
| medium | 708 FPS | 521 FPS |
| high | 658 FPS | 521 FPS |
| ultra | 571 FPS | 521 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 521 FPS |
| medium | 502 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 391 FPS | 380 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7600X and Ryzen 5 7640U


Ryzen 5 7600X
Ryzen 5 7600X
The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 7640U
Ryzen 5 7640U
The Ryzen 5 7640U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,856 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 7600X and Ryzen 5 7640U share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7640U — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 4.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7640U uses Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7600X scores 28,325 against the Ryzen 5 7640U's 20,856 — a 30.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7640U.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 5 7640U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+8% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.7 GHz+34% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) | Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 28,325+36% | 20,856 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,300 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,900 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,800 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7640U uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 5 7640U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X) / not specified (Ryzen 5 7640U). The Ryzen 5 7600X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Ryzen 5 7640U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 5 7640U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












