
M2 Max
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
M2 Max
2023Why buy it
- β +50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB).
- β Draws 36W instead of 105W, a 69W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (26,824 vs 28,325).
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +10.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 48 MB).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while M2 Max mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β191.7% higher power demand at 105W vs 36W.
M2 Max
2023Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- β +50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB).
- β Draws 36W instead of 105W, a 69W reduction.
Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +10.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (26,824 vs 28,325).
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 48 MB).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while M2 Max mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β191.7% higher power demand at 105W vs 36W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7600X better than M2 Max?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | M2 Max | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | M2 Max | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 437 FPS | 524 FPS |
| high | 342 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 279 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 429 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 379 FPS | 455 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | M2 Max | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 671 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 670 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 625 FPS | 571 FPS |
| ultra | 552 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 605 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 444 FPS | 479 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 423 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 281 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | M2 Max | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 671 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 671 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 671 FPS | 708 FPS |
| ultra | 668 FPS | 708 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 671 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 663 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 569 FPS | 658 FPS |
| ultra | 489 FPS | 571 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 368 FPS | 391 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of M2 Max and Ryzen 5 7600X
M2 Max
M2 Max
The M2 Max is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MBΒ +Β 48 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,824 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 7600X
Ryzen 5 7600X
The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The M2 Max packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads β the M2 Max has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the M2 Max versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X β a 35.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 2.424 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7600X is built on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) architecture. In PassMark, the M2 Max scores 26,824 against the Ryzen 5 7600X's 28,325 β a 5.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X. L3 cache: 48 MB on the M2 Max vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X.
| Feature | M2 Max | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 12+100% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 5.3 GHz+43% |
| Base Clock | 2.424 GHz | 4.7 GHz+94% |
| L3 Cache | 48 MB+50% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+500% | 6 MB |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | β | Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) |
| PassMark | 26,824 | 28,325+6% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 15,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 2,900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 13,800 |
Memory & Platform
The M2 Max uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR5-6400 memory speed. The Ryzen 5 7600X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB β 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (M2 Max) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 7600X). PCIe lanes: 0 (M2 Max) vs 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) β the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | M2 Max | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-6400 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | 128 GB+33% |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 7600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 5 7600X supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Virtualization (M2 Max) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X). Both include integrated graphics β Apple M2 Max GPU (M2 Max) and AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 5 7600X) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M2 Max targets Mobile, Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | M2 Max | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Apple M2 Max GPU | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Mobile | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












