PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9355P

2024

Why buy it

✅+243.3% higher PassMark.
✅+700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.4 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($2,998 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌166.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 105W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 5 7600X

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.5% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,699 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,998 MSRP).
✅Delivers 192.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,998 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 280W, a 175W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9355P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (28,325 vs 97,249).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9355P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 9355P

2024

Ryzen 5 7600X

2022

Why buy it

✅+243.3% higher PassMark.
✅+700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.5% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,699 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,998 MSRP).
✅Delivers 192.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,998 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 280W, a 175W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9355P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.4 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($2,998 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌166.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 105W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (28,325 vs 97,249).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9355P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9355P better than Ryzen 5 7600X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 9355P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 7600X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9355P is the better fit. You are getting 243.3% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9355P is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 7600X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 9355P is 902.7% more expensive on MSRP at $2,998 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it gives you 243.3% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Ryzen 5 7600X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 13.5% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 7600X is also 192.0% better value on MSRP (94.7 vs 32.4 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9355P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022), 700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 6/12. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9355P Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 7600X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9355P	Ryzen 5 7600X
1080p
low	174 FPS	266 FPS
medium	144 FPS	246 FPS
high	124 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	179 FPS
1440p
low	152 FPS	226 FPS
medium	123 FPS	189 FPS
high	101 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	85 FPS	157 FPS
medium	73 FPS	131 FPS
high	58 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	48 FPS	87 FPS

Open EPYC 9355P Open Ryzen 5 7600X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9355P	Ryzen 5 7600X
1080p
low	658 FPS	649 FPS
medium	566 FPS	524 FPS
high	459 FPS	436 FPS
ultra	397 FPS	386 FPS
1440p
low	548 FPS	544 FPS
medium	483 FPS	455 FPS
high	404 FPS	388 FPS
ultra	328 FPS	329 FPS
4K
low	333 FPS	341 FPS
medium	295 FPS	290 FPS
high	268 FPS	271 FPS
ultra	236 FPS	232 FPS

Open EPYC 9355P Open Ryzen 5 7600X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9355P	Ryzen 5 7600X
1080p
low	752 FPS	708 FPS
medium	638 FPS	652 FPS
high	593 FPS	571 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	484 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	708 FPS
medium	474 FPS	554 FPS
high	434 FPS	479 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	409 FPS
4K
low	405 FPS	463 FPS
medium	326 FPS	392 FPS
high	288 FPS	341 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	281 FPS

Open EPYC 9355P Open Ryzen 5 7600X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9355P	Ryzen 5 7600X
1080p
low	1018 FPS	708 FPS
medium	914 FPS	708 FPS
high	788 FPS	708 FPS
ultra	711 FPS	708 FPS
1440p
low	813 FPS	708 FPS
medium	707 FPS	708 FPS
high	606 FPS	658 FPS
ultra	535 FPS	571 FPS
4K
low	577 FPS	560 FPS
medium	512 FPS	502 FPS
high	449 FPS	452 FPS
ultra	394 FPS	391 FPS

Open EPYC 9355P Open Ryzen 5 7600X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9355P and Ryzen 5 7600X

EPYC 9355P

The EPYC 9355P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.55 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 97,249 points. Launch price was $2,998.

Ryzen 5 7600X

The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9355P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 9355P has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9355P versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 3.55 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The EPYC 9355P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9355P scores 97,249 against the Ryzen 5 7600X's 28,325 — a 109.8% lead for the EPYC 9355P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9355P vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X.

Feature	EPYC 9355P	Ryzen 5 7600X
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+433%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	5.3 GHz+20%
Base Clock	3.55 GHz	4.7 GHz+32%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+700%	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	6 MB+500%
Process	4 nm-20%	5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
PassMark	97,249+243%	28,325
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	15,300
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,900
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	13,800

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9355P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen 5 7600X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9355P) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 7600X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9355P) vs 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) — the EPYC 9355P offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9355P) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X).

Feature	EPYC 9355P	Ryzen 5 7600X
Socket	SP5	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+4700%	128 GB
RAM Channels	12+500%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+357%	28

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9355P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X). The Ryzen 5 7600X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the EPYC 9355P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 9355P targets Data Center / Single Socket, Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 9355P rivals Xeon 6740P; Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.

Feature	EPYC 9355P	Ryzen 5 7600X
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	AMD-V
Target Use	Data Center / Single Socket	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9355P launched at $2998 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 7600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($2998 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 7600X is $2699 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9355P delivers 32.4 pts/$ vs 94.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 7600X — making the Ryzen 5 7600X the 98% better value option.