
Core Ultra 7 255H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 7 255H
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.2% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 26W instead of 105W, a 79W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 255H across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (13,800 vs 15,700).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 255H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌303.8% higher power demand at 105W vs 26W.
Core Ultra 7 255H
2025Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.2% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 26W instead of 105W, a 79W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 255H across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (13,800 vs 15,700).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 255H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌303.8% higher power demand at 105W vs 26W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 255H better than Ryzen 5 7600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 255H | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 232 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 251 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 255H | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 773 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 637 FPS | 524 FPS |
| high | 521 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 715 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 570 FPS | 455 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 391 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 419 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 342 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 316 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 271 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 255H | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 773 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 773 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 773 FPS | 571 FPS |
| ultra | 662 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 773 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 735 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 635 FPS | 479 FPS |
| ultra | 544 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 642 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 534 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 409 FPS | 281 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 255H | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 773 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 773 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 773 FPS | 708 FPS |
| ultra | 773 FPS | 708 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 773 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 773 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 703 FPS | 658 FPS |
| ultra | 609 FPS | 571 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 540 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 489 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 391 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 255H and Ryzen 5 7600X

Core Ultra 7 255H
Core Ultra 7 255H
The Core Ultra 7 255H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 26 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 30,932 points. Launch price was $514.


Ryzen 5 7600X
Ryzen 5 7600X
The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 255H packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 7 255H has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 255H versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 4.4 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 255H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 255H scores 30,932 against the Ryzen 5 7600X's 28,325 — a 8.8% lead for the Core Ultra 7 255H. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 2,900, a 3.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,700 vs 13,800 (12.9% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255H). L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core Ultra 7 255H vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 255H | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 16+167% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.3 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.7 GHz+7% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 32 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | — | 6 MB |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-H (2025) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 30,932+9% | 28,325 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 15,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,800 | 2,900+4% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,700+14% | 13,800 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 255H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 28 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 7 255H) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 255H | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 7600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 5 7600X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 255H) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Arc Graphics 140T (Core Ultra 7 255H) and AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 5 7600X) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 255H targets High-End Laptop, Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 255H | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | High-End Laptop | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












