
Core i9-9900X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-9900X
2018Why buy it
- ✅57.1% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,459 vs 2,900).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,985 vs 15,300).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($989 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌57.1% higher power demand at 165W vs 105W.
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+98.8% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $690 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $989 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 332.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $989 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 165W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i9-9900X
2018Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅57.1% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+98.8% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $690 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $989 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 332.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $989 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 165W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,459 vs 2,900).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,985 vs 15,300).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($989 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌57.1% higher power demand at 165W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7600X better than Core i9-9900X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 524 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 384 FPS | 455 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 279 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 571 FPS |
| ultra | 527 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 479 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 281 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 708 FPS |
| ultra | 541 FPS | 708 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 658 FPS |
| ultra | 541 FPS | 571 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 391 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-9900X and Ryzen 5 7600X

Core i9-9900X
Core i9-9900X
The Core i9-9900X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 21,655 points. Launch price was $989.


Ryzen 5 7600X
Ryzen 5 7600X
The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-9900X packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-9900X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i9-9900X versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X — a 16.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 3.5 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The Core i9-9900X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9900X scores 21,655 against the Ryzen 5 7600X's 28,325 — a 26.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 13,985 vs 15,300 (9% advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,459 vs 2,900, a 66.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,475 vs 13,800 (37.2% advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X). L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-9900X vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X.
| Feature | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 5.3 GHz+18% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.7 GHz+34% |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+66% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 6 MB+500% |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 21,655 | 28,325+31% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 13,985 | 15,300+9% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,459 | 2,900+99% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,475 | 13,800+46% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-9900X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i9-9900X versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 5 7600X — the Ryzen 5 7600X supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 4 (Core i9-9900X) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 7600X). PCIe lanes: 44 (Core i9-9900X) vs 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) — the Core i9-9900X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X299 (Core i9-9900X) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X).
| Feature | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-5200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 44+57% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-9900X) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X). The Ryzen 5 7600X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Core i9-9900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-9900X launched at $989 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 7600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($989 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 7600X is $690 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-9900X delivers 21.9 pts/$ vs 94.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 7600X — making the Ryzen 5 7600X the 124.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $989 | $299-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.9 | 94.7+332% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












