
Core i9-7940X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-7940X
2017Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,452 vs 28,325).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.2 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($1,399 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌57.1% higher power demand at 165W vs 105W.
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,100 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 420.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 18.2 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 165W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i9-7940X
2017Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,100 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 420.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 18.2 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 165W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,452 vs 28,325).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.2 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($1,399 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌57.1% higher power demand at 165W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7600X better than Core i9-7940X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-7940X | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-7940X | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 384 FPS | 524 FPS |
| high | 331 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 303 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 455 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 219 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-7940X | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 534 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 451 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 571 FPS |
| ultra | 365 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 415 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 479 FPS |
| ultra | 334 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 379 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 319 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 283 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 233 FPS | 281 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-7940X | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 636 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 636 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 636 FPS | 708 FPS |
| ultra | 610 FPS | 708 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 636 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 636 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 658 FPS |
| ultra | 500 FPS | 571 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 418 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 391 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-7940X and Ryzen 5 7600X

Core i9-7940X
Core i9-7940X
The Core i9-7940X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 25,452 points. Launch price was $1,399.


Ryzen 5 7600X
Ryzen 5 7600X
The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-7940X packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-7940X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-7940X versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 3.1 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The Core i9-7940X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-7940X scores 25,452 against the Ryzen 5 7600X's 28,325 — a 10.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-7940X vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X.
| Feature | Core i9-7940X | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 28+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.3 GHz+20% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz | 4.7 GHz+52% |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+66% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 6 MB+500% |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 25,452 | 28,325+11% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 15,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 13,800 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-7940X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-7940X | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-7940X) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X). The Ryzen 5 7600X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Core i9-7940X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | Core i9-7940X | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-7940X launched at $1399 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 7600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($1399 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 7600X is $1100 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-7940X delivers 18.2 pts/$ vs 94.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 7600X — making the Ryzen 5 7600X the 135.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-7940X | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1399 | $299-79% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.2 | 94.7+420% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











