
Core i9-13900KS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13900KS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.8% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 86.6 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 150W vs 105W.
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 9.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 86.6 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 150W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900KS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,300 vs 40,998).
Core i9-13900KS
2023Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.8% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 9.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 86.6 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 150W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 86.6 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 150W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900KS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,300 vs 40,998).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900KS better than Ryzen 5 7600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 792 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 688 FPS | 524 FPS |
| high | 550 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 664 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 597 FPS | 455 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 400 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 336 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 312 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 794 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 660 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 571 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 711 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 599 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 479 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 522 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 463 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 412 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 281 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1091 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 975 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 853 FPS | 708 FPS |
| ultra | 760 FPS | 708 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 900 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 791 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 690 FPS | 658 FPS |
| ultra | 607 FPS | 571 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 662 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 592 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 523 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 391 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900KS and Ryzen 5 7600X

Core i9-13900KS
Core i9-13900KS
The Core i9-13900KS is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.8 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 60,543 points. Launch price was $699.


Ryzen 5 7600X
Ryzen 5 7600X
The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900KS packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-13900KS has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.8 GHz on the Core i9-13900KS versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X — a 9% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900KS (base: 3.2 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The Core i9-13900KS uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900KS scores 60,543 against the Ryzen 5 7600X's 28,325 — a 72.5% lead for the Core i9-13900KS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 40,998 vs 15,300 (91.3% advantage for the Core i9-13900KS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,123 vs 2,900, a 7.4% lead for the Core i9-13900KS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 21,421 vs 13,800 (43.3% advantage for the Core i9-13900KS). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900KS vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X.
| Feature | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+300% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.8 GHz+9% | 5.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.7 GHz+47% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total)+13% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 6 MB+200% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 60,543+114% | 28,325 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 40,998+168% | 15,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,123+8% | 2,900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 21,421+55% | 13,800 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900KS uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i9-13900KS supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900KS) vs 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) — the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i9-13900KS) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X).
| Feature | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 5 7600X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i9-13900KS) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-13900KS) and AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 5 7600X) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i9-13900KS rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-13900KS launched at $699 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 7600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($699 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 7600X is $400 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900KS delivers 86.6 pts/$ vs 94.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 7600X — making the Ryzen 5 7600X the 9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $299-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 86.6 | 94.7+9% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












