
Core i9-13900HX
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13900HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.7% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 105W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen 5 7600X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900HX across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,300 vs 29,493).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Core i9-13900HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌90.9% higher power demand at 105W vs 55W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-13900HX.
Core i9-13900HX
2023Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.7% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 105W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen 5 7600X.
Why buy it
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900HX across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,300 vs 29,493).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Core i9-13900HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌90.9% higher power demand at 105W vs 55W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-13900HX.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900HX better than Ryzen 5 7600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900HX | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 311 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900HX | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 350 FPS | 524 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 252 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 306 FPS | 455 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13900HX | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 762 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 543 FPS | 571 FPS |
| ultra | 467 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 680 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 567 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 479 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 281 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13900HX | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1012 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 905 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 792 FPS | 708 FPS |
| ultra | 704 FPS | 708 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 840 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 739 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 646 FPS | 658 FPS |
| ultra | 568 FPS | 571 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 620 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 555 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 491 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 391 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900HX and Ryzen 5 7600X

Core i9-13900HX
Core i9-13900HX
The Core i9-13900HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 42,437 points. Launch price was $668.


Ryzen 5 7600X
Ryzen 5 7600X
The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900HX packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-13900HX has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900HX versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900HX (base: 2.2 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The Core i9-13900HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900HX scores 42,437 against the Ryzen 5 7600X's 28,325 — a 39.9% lead for the Core i9-13900HX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 29,493 vs 15,300 (63.4% advantage for the Core i9-13900HX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,878 vs 2,900, a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,944 vs 13,800 (8% advantage for the Core i9-13900HX). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900HX vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X.
| Feature | Core i9-13900HX | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+300% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+2% | 5.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 4.7 GHz+114% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total)+13% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 6 MB+200% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 42,437+50% | 28,325 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 29,493+93% | 15,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,878 | 2,900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,944+8% | 13,800 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i9-13900HX supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900HX) vs 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) — the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM770,WM790 (Core i9-13900HX) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X).
| Feature | Core i9-13900HX | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 5 7600X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-13900HX) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-13900HX) and AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 5 7600X) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13900HX targets Performance Gaming / Mobile Workstation, Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i9-13900HX rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX; Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | Core i9-13900HX | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Performance Gaming / Mobile Workstation | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












