
Core i9-13900E
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13900E
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.1 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($554 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $255 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $554 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 29.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $554 MSRP).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (13,800 vs 15,000).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Core i9-13900E
2023Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $255 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $554 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 29.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $554 MSRP).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.1 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($554 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (13,800 vs 15,000).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900E better than Ryzen 5 7600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900E | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 305 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900E | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 412 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 524 FPS |
| high | 293 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 455 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 210 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13900E | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1012 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 1012 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 977 FPS | 571 FPS |
| ultra | 838 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 991 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 881 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 793 FPS | 479 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 599 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 281 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13900E | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1012 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 1012 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 935 FPS | 708 FPS |
| ultra | 810 FPS | 708 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 1010 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 881 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 761 FPS | 658 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 571 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 756 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 662 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 578 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 391 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900E and Ryzen 5 7600X

Core i9-13900E
Core i9-13900E
The Core i9-13900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 40,476 points. Launch price was $499.


Ryzen 5 7600X
Ryzen 5 7600X
The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900E packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-13900E has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-13900E versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 1.8 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The Core i9-13900E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900E scores 40,476 against the Ryzen 5 7600X's 28,325 — a 35.3% lead for the Core i9-13900E. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,606 vs 2,900, a 10.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,000 vs 13,800 (8.3% advantage for the Core i9-13900E). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900E vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X.
| Feature | Core i9-13900E | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+300% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.3 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 4.7 GHz+161% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total)+13% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 6 MB+200% |
| Process | 10 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 40,476+43% | 28,325 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 15,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,606 | 2,900+11% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,000+9% | 13,800 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900E) vs 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) — the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: W680,Q670,Z790,H770 (Core i9-13900E) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X).
| Feature | Core i9-13900E | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 7600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 5 7600X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900E) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-13900E) and AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 5 7600X) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13900E targets Embedded, Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | Core i9-13900E | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Embedded | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-13900E launched at $554 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 7600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($554 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 7600X is $255 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900E delivers 73.1 pts/$ vs 94.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 7600X — making the Ryzen 5 7600X the 25.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13900E | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $554 | $299-46% |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.1 | 94.7+30% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












