
Core i9-12900KS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-12900KS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 58.9 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($739 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 150W vs 105W.
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $440 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $739 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 60.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 58.9 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $739 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 150W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12900KS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,300 vs 27,796).
Core i9-12900KS
2022Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $440 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $739 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 60.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 58.9 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $739 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 150W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 58.9 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($739 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 150W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12900KS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,300 vs 27,796).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-12900KS better than Ryzen 5 7600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-12900KS | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 283 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-12900KS | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 716 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 603 FPS | 524 FPS |
| high | 501 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 443 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 455 FPS |
| high | 454 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-12900KS | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 866 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 686 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 605 FPS | 571 FPS |
| ultra | 502 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 748 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 602 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 523 FPS | 479 FPS |
| ultra | 441 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 281 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-12900KS | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 973 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 879 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 763 FPS | 708 FPS |
| ultra | 693 FPS | 708 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 723 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 658 FPS |
| ultra | 556 FPS | 571 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 502 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 449 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 391 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-12900KS and Ryzen 5 7600X

Core i9-12900KS
Core i9-12900KS
The Core i9-12900KS is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 43,528 points. Launch price was $499.


Ryzen 5 7600X
Ryzen 5 7600X
The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-12900KS packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-12900KS has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core i9-12900KS versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.4 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The Core i9-12900KS uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-12900KS scores 43,528 against the Ryzen 5 7600X's 28,325 — a 42.3% lead for the Core i9-12900KS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 27,796 vs 15,300 (58% advantage for the Core i9-12900KS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,082 vs 2,900, a 32.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900KS vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X.
| Feature | Core i9-12900KS | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+167% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.7 GHz+38% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+7% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 6 MB+380% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 43,528+54% | 28,325 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 27,796+82% | 15,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,082 | 2,900+39% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 13,800 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-12900KS uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-12900KS) vs 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) — the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i9-12900KS) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X).
| Feature | Core i9-12900KS | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-12900KS) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X). Both include integrated graphics — UHD 770 (Core i9-12900KS) and AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 5 7600X) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | Core i9-12900KS | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD 770 | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-12900KS launched at $739 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 7600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($739 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 7600X is $440 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-12900KS delivers 58.9 pts/$ vs 94.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 7600X — making the Ryzen 5 7600X the 46.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-12900KS | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $739 | $299-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 58.9 | 94.7+61% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












