
Core i9-10900E
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-10900E
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,332 vs 28,325).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.6 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($488 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.8% higher average FPS across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Costs $189 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $488 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 139.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 39.6 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $488 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Core i9-10900E
2020Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.8% higher average FPS across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Costs $189 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $488 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 139.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 39.6 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $488 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,332 vs 28,325).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.6 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($488 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7600X better than Core i9-10900E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-10900E | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-10900E | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 420 FPS | 524 FPS |
| high | 359 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 419 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 455 FPS |
| high | 317 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-10900E | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 571 FPS |
| ultra | 449 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 479 FPS |
| ultra | 403 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 361 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 281 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-10900E | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 708 FPS |
| ultra | 483 FPS | 708 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 658 FPS |
| ultra | 483 FPS | 571 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 445 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 389 FPS | 391 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10900E and Ryzen 5 7600X

Core i9-10900E
Core i9-10900E
The Core i9-10900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,332 points. Launch price was $488.


Ryzen 5 7600X
Ryzen 5 7600X
The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10900E packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-10900E has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i9-10900E versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X — a 12% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 2.8 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The Core i9-10900E uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10900E scores 19,332 against the Ryzen 5 7600X's 28,325 — a 37.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900E vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X.
| Feature | Core i9-10900E | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz | 5.3 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 4.7 GHz+68% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+60% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 6 MB+2300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 19,332 | 28,325+47% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 15,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 13,800 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10900E uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10900E versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 5 7600X — the Ryzen 5 7600X supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i9-10900E) vs 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) — the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1200 (Core i9-10900E) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X).
| Feature | Core i9-10900E | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR5-5200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 28+75% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 7600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 5 7600X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10900E) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i9-10900E) and AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 5 7600X) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | Core i9-10900E | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-10900E launched at $488 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 7600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($488 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 7600X is $189 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10900E delivers 39.6 pts/$ vs 94.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 7600X — making the Ryzen 5 7600X the 82.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-10900E | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $488 | $299-39% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.6 | 94.7+139% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












