PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700F

2023

Why buy it

✅+61.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Delivers 12.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 106.4 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes (Intel Laminar RM1)), unlike Ryzen 5 7600X.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,676 vs 2,900).
❌
20.1% HIGHER MSRP
$359 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 5 7600X

2022

Why buy it

✅+8.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $60 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Core i7-13700F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,300 vs 24,775).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 94.7 vs 106.4 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-13700F.

Core i7-13700F

2023

Ryzen 5 7600X

2022

Why buy it

✅+61.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Delivers 12.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 106.4 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes (Intel Laminar RM1)), unlike Ryzen 5 7600X.

Why buy it

✅+8.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $60 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Core i7-13700F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,676 vs 2,900).
❌
20.1% HIGHER MSRP
$359 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,300 vs 24,775).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 94.7 vs 106.4 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-13700F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700F better than Ryzen 5 7600X?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 5 7600X is ahead with a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700F pulls ahead with 61.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700F is the better fit. You are getting 61.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700F is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700F is 20.1% more expensive on MSRP at $359 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it gives you 61.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The trade-off is that Ryzen 5 7600X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 12.4% better value on MSRP (106.4 vs 94.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM5 + DDR5 setup, Ryzen 5 7600X can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 7600X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700F	Ryzen 5 7600X
1080p
low	264 FPS	266 FPS
medium	254 FPS	246 FPS
high	210 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	181 FPS	179 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	226 FPS
medium	193 FPS	189 FPS
high	153 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	154 FPS	157 FPS
medium	131 FPS	131 FPS
high	101 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	87 FPS

Open Core i7-13700F Open Ryzen 5 7600X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700F	Ryzen 5 7600X
1080p
low	344 FPS	649 FPS
medium	293 FPS	524 FPS
high	247 FPS	436 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	386 FPS
1440p
low	299 FPS	544 FPS
medium	264 FPS	455 FPS
high	224 FPS	388 FPS
ultra	192 FPS	329 FPS
4K
low	177 FPS	341 FPS
medium	160 FPS	290 FPS
high	152 FPS	271 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	232 FPS

Open Core i7-13700F Open Ryzen 5 7600X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700F	Ryzen 5 7600X
1080p
low	647 FPS	708 FPS
medium	530 FPS	652 FPS
high	467 FPS	571 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	484 FPS
1440p
low	590 FPS	708 FPS
medium	491 FPS	554 FPS
high	427 FPS	479 FPS
ultra	370 FPS	409 FPS
4K
low	433 FPS	463 FPS
medium	373 FPS	392 FPS
high	338 FPS	341 FPS
ultra	289 FPS	281 FPS

Open Core i7-13700F Open Ryzen 5 7600X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700F	Ryzen 5 7600X
1080p
low	936 FPS	708 FPS
medium	851 FPS	708 FPS
high	735 FPS	708 FPS
ultra	660 FPS	708 FPS
1440p
low	799 FPS	708 FPS
medium	712 FPS	708 FPS
high	615 FPS	658 FPS
ultra	542 FPS	571 FPS
4K
low	548 FPS	560 FPS
medium	497 FPS	502 FPS
high	444 FPS	452 FPS
ultra	388 FPS	391 FPS

Open Core i7-13700F Open Ryzen 5 7600X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700F and Ryzen 5 7600X

Core i7-13700F

The Core i7-13700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,212 points. Launch price was $359.

Ryzen 5 7600X

The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700F packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-13700F has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13700F versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 2.1 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The Core i7-13700F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700F scores 38,212 against the Ryzen 5 7600X's 28,325 — a 29.7% lead for the Core i7-13700F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 24,775 vs 15,300 (47.3% advantage for the Core i7-13700F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,676 vs 2,900, a 8% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,254 vs 13,800 (3.2% advantage for the Core i7-13700F). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700F vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X.

Feature	Core i7-13700F	Ryzen 5 7600X
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+167%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz	5.3 GHz+2%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	4.7 GHz+124%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+7%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	6 MB+200%
Process	Intel 7 nm	5 nm, 6 nm-29%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
PassMark	38,212+35%	28,325
Cinebench R23 Multi	24,775+62%	15,300
Geekbench 6 Single	2,676	2,900+8%
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,254+3%	13,800

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i7-13700F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700F) vs 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) — the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i7-13700F) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X).

Feature	Core i7-13700F	Ryzen 5 7600X
Socket	LGA1700	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	28+40%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 7600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 5 7600X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-13700F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X). The Ryzen 5 7600X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Core i7-13700F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-13700F targets High-end Gaming, Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700F rivals Ryzen 7 7700X; Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.

Feature	Core i7-13700F	Ryzen 5 7600X
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	AMD-V
Target Use	High-end Gaming	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700F launched at $359 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 7600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($359 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 7600X is $60 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700F delivers 106.4 pts/$ vs 94.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 7600X — making the Core i7-13700F the 11.6% better value option.