
Core i5-9400
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-9400
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $107 less on MSRP ($192 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,372 vs 28,325).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (9 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 48.8 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($192 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +75.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 9 MB).
- ✅Delivers 94.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 48.8 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌55.7% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$192 MSRP
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Core i5-9400
2019Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $107 less on MSRP ($192 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +75.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 9 MB).
- ✅Delivers 94.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 48.8 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,372 vs 28,325).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (9 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 48.8 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($192 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌55.7% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$192 MSRP
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7600X better than Core i5-9400?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-9400 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-9400 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 524 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 455 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 196 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-9400 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 571 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 479 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 281 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-9400 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 708 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 708 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 658 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 571 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 391 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-9400 and Ryzen 5 7600X

Core i5-9400
Core i5-9400
The Core i5-9400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,372 points. Launch price was $182.


Ryzen 5 7600X
Ryzen 5 7600X
The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-9400 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, matching the Ryzen 5 7600X's 6 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-9400 versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X — a 25.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 2.9 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The Core i5-9400 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-9400 scores 9,372 against the Ryzen 5 7600X's 28,325 — a 100.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X. L3 cache: 9 MB (total) on the Core i5-9400 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X.
| Feature | Core i5-9400 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz | 5.3 GHz+29% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 4.7 GHz+62% |
| L3 Cache | 9 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+256% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 6 MB+2300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 9,372 | 28,325+202% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 15,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 13,800 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-9400 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-9400 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 5 7600X — the Ryzen 5 7600X supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-9400) vs 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) — the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i5-9400 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-5200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 28+75% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 7600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 5 7600X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-9400) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i5-9400) and AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 5 7600X) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-9400 targets Desktop, Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | Core i5-9400 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-9400 launched at $192 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 7600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($192 vs $299), the Core i5-9400 is $107 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-9400 delivers 48.8 pts/$ vs 94.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 7600X — making the Ryzen 5 7600X the 64% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-9400 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $192-36% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 48.8 | 94.7+94% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











