
Core i9-13900H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13900H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.5 vs 118.0 PassMark/$ ($617 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 7600.
Ryzen 5 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Costs $388 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 165.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 118.0 vs 44.5 PassMark/$ ($229 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Core i9-13900H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,013 vs 27,444).
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Core i9-13900H
2023Ryzen 5 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Costs $388 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 165.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 118.0 vs 44.5 PassMark/$ ($229 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Core i9-13900H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.5 vs 118.0 PassMark/$ ($617 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 7600.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,013 vs 27,444).
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900H better than Ryzen 5 7600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900H | Ryzen 5 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900H | Ryzen 5 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 636 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 366 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 416 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 318 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 279 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 225 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13900H | Ryzen 5 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 675 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 657 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 575 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 488 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 675 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 559 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 412 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 284 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13900H | Ryzen 5 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 686 FPS | 675 FPS |
| medium | 686 FPS | 675 FPS |
| high | 686 FPS | 675 FPS |
| ultra | 672 FPS | 675 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 686 FPS | 675 FPS |
| medium | 686 FPS | 675 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 666 FPS |
| ultra | 552 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 567 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 454 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 392 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900H and Ryzen 5 7600

Core i9-13900H
Core i9-13900H
The Core i9-13900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,444 points. Launch price was $617.


Ryzen 5 7600
Ryzen 5 7600
The Ryzen 5 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,013 points. Launch price was $229.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-13900H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900H versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600 — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i9-13900H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7600 uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900H scores 27,444 against the Ryzen 5 7600's 27,013 — a 1.6% lead for the Core i9-13900H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900H vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i9-13900H | Ryzen 5 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+6% | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz+46% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 27,444+2% | 27,013 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 14,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,800 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 12,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7600 uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-13900H | Ryzen 5 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-13900H) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600). The Ryzen 5 7600 includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Core i9-13900H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600 rivals Core i5-13400.
| Feature | Core i9-13900H | Ryzen 5 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-13900H launched at $617 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 7600 debuted at $229. On MSRP ($617 vs $229), the Ryzen 5 7600 is $388 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900H delivers 44.5 pts/$ vs 118.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 7600 — making the Ryzen 5 7600 the 90.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13900H | Ryzen 5 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $617 | $229-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.5 | 118.0+165% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












