
Core 5 210H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7540U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 210H
2024Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7540U across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,602 vs 18,607).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.
Ryzen 5 7540U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core 5 210H
2024Ryzen 5 7540U
2023Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7540U across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,602 vs 18,607).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7540U better than Core 5 210H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 210H | Ryzen 5 7540U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 210H | Ryzen 5 7540U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 235 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 160 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 210H | Ryzen 5 7540U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 465 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 465 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 465 FPS | 465 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 465 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 465 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 465 FPS | 433 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 465 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 426 FPS |
| high | 404 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 301 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 210H | Ryzen 5 7540U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 465 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 465 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 465 FPS | 465 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 465 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 465 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 465 FPS | 465 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 465 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 465 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 439 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 376 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 210H and Ryzen 5 7540U

Core 5 210H
Core 5 210H
The Core 5 210H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 18,602 points. Launch price was $342.


Ryzen 5 7540U
Ryzen 5 7540U
The Ryzen 5 7540U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,607 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core 5 210H packs 8 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7540U offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core 5 210H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core 5 210H versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7540U — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7540U (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core 5 210H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7540U uses Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 210H scores 18,602 against the Ryzen 5 7540U's 18,607 — a 0% lead for the Ryzen 5 7540U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 5 210H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7540U.
| Feature | Core 5 210H | Ryzen 5 7540U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 12+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.9 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz+45% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 4 nm-60% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 18,602 | 18,607 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 210H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 7540U uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 210H | Ryzen 5 7540U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












