
Core 3 100HL
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7535HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 3 100HL
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,586 vs 17,820).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $306 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7535HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Ryzen 5 7535HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 3 100HL across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Core 3 100HL
2024Ryzen 5 7535HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,586 vs 17,820).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $306 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7535HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 3 100HL across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 3 100HL better than Ryzen 5 7535HS?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 3 100HL | Ryzen 5 7535HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 3 100HL | Ryzen 5 7535HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 146 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 3 100HL | Ryzen 5 7535HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 440 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 440 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 344 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 440 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 440 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 387 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 439 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 350 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 312 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 193 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 3 100HL | Ryzen 5 7535HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 440 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 440 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 440 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 440 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 440 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 440 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 391 FPS | 364 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 3 100HL and Ryzen 5 7535HS

Core 3 100HL
Core 3 100HL
The Core 3 100HL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,586 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 7535HS
Ryzen 5 7535HS
The Ryzen 5 7535HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.55 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 17,820 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core 3 100HL packs 8 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7535HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core 3 100HL has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core 3 100HL versus 4.55 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7535HS — a 1.1% clock advantage for the Core 3 100HL (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core 3 100HL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7535HS uses Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core 3 100HL scores 17,586 against the Ryzen 5 7535HS's 17,820 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 7535HS. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 3 100HL vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7535HS.
| Feature | Core 3 100HL | Ryzen 5 7535HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 12+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+1% | 4.55 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz+57% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 6 nm-40% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) | Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 17,586 | 17,820+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Core 3 100HL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7535HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 3 100HL | Ryzen 5 7535HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












