
Ryzen 5 220
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7535H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 220
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (14 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 740M, while Ryzen 5 7535H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,762 vs 18,832).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7535H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen 5 7535H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 220 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 220 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 220
2025Ryzen 5 7535H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (14 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 740M, while Ryzen 5 7535H needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,762 vs 18,832).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7535H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 220 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 220 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 220 better than Ryzen 5 7535H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 220 | Ryzen 5 7535H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 232 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 220 | Ryzen 5 7535H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 359 FPS |
| medium | 341 FPS | 299 FPS |
| high | 293 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 250 FPS | 230 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 362 FPS | 311 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 205 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 148 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 220 | Ryzen 5 7535H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 469 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 467 FPS |
| ultra | 469 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 469 FPS | 435 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 445 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 438 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 216 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 220 | Ryzen 5 7535H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 469 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 469 FPS | 471 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 469 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 469 FPS | 471 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 469 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 383 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 220 and Ryzen 5 7535H


Ryzen 5 220
Ryzen 5 220
The Ryzen 5 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,762 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 7535H
Ryzen 5 7535H
The Ryzen 5 7535H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.55 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 18,832 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 220 and Ryzen 5 7535H share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 220 versus 4.55 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7535H — a 7.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 220 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 220 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7535H uses Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 220 scores 18,762 against the Ryzen 5 7535H's 18,832 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 7535H. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 220 | Ryzen 5 7535H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+8% | 4.55 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-33% | 6 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point (2024−2025) | Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 18,762 | 18,832 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,300 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,700 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 220 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 7535H uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 220 | Ryzen 5 7535H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 14 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 220) / not specified (Ryzen 5 7535H). The Ryzen 5 220 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 740M), while the Ryzen 5 7535H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 220 targets Thin and Light Laptop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 220 | Ryzen 5 7535H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 740M | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Thin and Light Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












