Core Ultra 7 258V vs Ryzen 5 7535H

Intel

Core Ultra 7 258V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 7535H

6 Cores12 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.55 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 7 258V

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Arc 140V, while Ryzen 5 7535H needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $450 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7535H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Ryzen 5 7535H

2023

Why buy it

  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 258V across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (18,832 vs 18,947).
  • 105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 258V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 7 258V better than Ryzen 5 7535H?
Yes. Core Ultra 7 258V is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 5.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 7 258V is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 5.7% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 7 258V is the better fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 7 258V is the smarter buy today. Core Ultra 7 258V is at an unclear MSRP at $450 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 5.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (42.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 258V is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore Ultra 7 258VRyzen 5 7535H
1080p
low272 FPS168 FPS
medium243 FPS146 FPS
high205 FPS119 FPS
ultra176 FPS100 FPS
1440p
low230 FPS141 FPS
medium185 FPS121 FPS
high152 FPS99 FPS
ultra134 FPS83 FPS
4K
low161 FPS77 FPS
medium130 FPS71 FPS
high101 FPS56 FPS
ultra89 FPS44 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore Ultra 7 258VRyzen 5 7535H
1080p
low217 FPS359 FPS
medium179 FPS299 FPS
high161 FPS264 FPS
ultra142 FPS230 FPS
1440p
low184 FPS311 FPS
medium157 FPS263 FPS
high145 FPS240 FPS
ultra125 FPS205 FPS
4K
low141 FPS231 FPS
medium124 FPS199 FPS
high117 FPS182 FPS
ultra102 FPS148 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore Ultra 7 258VRyzen 5 7535H
1080p
low474 FPS471 FPS
medium474 FPS471 FPS
high474 FPS467 FPS
ultra474 FPS397 FPS
1440p
low474 FPS471 FPS
medium474 FPS435 FPS
high474 FPS394 FPS
ultra468 FPS339 FPS
4K
low474 FPS369 FPS
medium462 FPS306 FPS
high404 FPS268 FPS
ultra336 FPS216 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore Ultra 7 258VRyzen 5 7535H
1080p
low474 FPS471 FPS
medium474 FPS471 FPS
high474 FPS471 FPS
ultra474 FPS471 FPS
1440p
low474 FPS471 FPS
medium474 FPS471 FPS
high474 FPS471 FPS
ultra474 FPS471 FPS
4K
low474 FPS471 FPS
medium474 FPS471 FPS
high474 FPS436 FPS
ultra418 FPS383 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 258V and Ryzen 5 7535H

Intel

Core Ultra 7 258V

The Core Ultra 7 258V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,947 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 5 7535H

The Ryzen 5 7535H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.55 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 18,832 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 258V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7535H offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 7 258V has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 258V versus 4.55 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7535H — a 5.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 258V (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 258V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7535H uses Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 258V scores 18,947 against the Ryzen 5 7535H's 18,832 — a 0.6% lead for the Core Ultra 7 258V. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 258V vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7535H.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 258VRyzen 5 7535H
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz+5%
4.55 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3.3 GHz+50%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
2.5 MB (per core)+400%
512K (per core)
Process
3 nm-50%
6 nm
Architecture
Lunar Lake (2024)
Rembrandt-R (2023−2025)
PassMark
18,947
18,832
Cinebench R23 Multi
10,000
Geekbench 6 Single
2,750
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 258V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 7535H uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 258VRyzen 5 7535H
Socket
FCBGA2833
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5X-8533
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 258V) / not specified (Ryzen 5 7535H). The Core Ultra 7 258V includes integrated graphics (Arc 140V), while the Ryzen 5 7535H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 258V targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 258V rivals Ryzen 7 8840U.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 258VRyzen 5 7535H
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Arc 140V
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming