
Core i5-12400
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7535H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 730, while Ryzen 5 7535H needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 7535H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,794 vs 18,832).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $209 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7535H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Ryzen 5 7535H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-12400 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400.
Core i5-12400
2022Ryzen 5 7535H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 730, while Ryzen 5 7535H needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 7535H.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,794 vs 18,832).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $209 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7535H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-12400 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7535H better than Core i5-12400?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400 | Ryzen 5 7535H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400 | Ryzen 5 7535H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 359 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 299 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 230 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 311 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 205 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 148 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400 | Ryzen 5 7535H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 470 FPS | 467 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 435 FPS |
| high | 470 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 216 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400 | Ryzen 5 7535H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 470 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 471 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 470 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 471 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 383 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400 and Ryzen 5 7535H

Core i5-12400
Core i5-12400
The Core i5-12400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,794 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 7535H
Ryzen 5 7535H
The Ryzen 5 7535H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.55 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 18,832 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-12400 and Ryzen 5 7535H share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400 versus 4.55 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7535H — a 3.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7535H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-12400 uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7535H uses Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400 scores 18,794 against the Ryzen 5 7535H's 18,832 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 7535H. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7535H.
| Feature | Core i5-12400 | Ryzen 5 7535H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.55 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 18,794 | 18,832 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,400 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,381 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,632 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7535H uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400 | Ryzen 5 7535H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400) / not specified (Ryzen 5 7535H). The Core i5-12400 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 730), while the Ryzen 5 7535H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400 targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400 rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400 | Ryzen 5 7535H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 730 | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












