
Core i7-11700T
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7533HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-11700T
2021Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 750, while Ryzen 5 7533HS needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 7533HS.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7533HS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $323 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7533HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7533HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 7533HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,231 vs 15,393).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-11700T.
Core i7-11700T
2021Ryzen 5 7533HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 750, while Ryzen 5 7533HS needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 7533HS.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7533HS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $323 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7533HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7533HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,231 vs 15,393).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-11700T.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-11700T better than Ryzen 5 7533HS?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-11700T | Ryzen 5 7533HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-11700T | Ryzen 5 7533HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 244 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 142 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-11700T | Ryzen 5 7533HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 381 FPS |
| medium | 385 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 381 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 381 FPS |
| medium | 385 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 361 FPS |
| medium | 364 FPS | 300 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 213 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-11700T | Ryzen 5 7533HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 381 FPS |
| medium | 385 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 381 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 381 FPS |
| medium | 385 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 381 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 381 FPS |
| medium | 385 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 353 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-11700T and Ryzen 5 7533HS

Core i7-11700T
Core i7-11700T
The Core i7-11700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,393 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 7533HS
Ryzen 5 7533HS
The Ryzen 5 7533HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Setembro 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 15,231 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-11700T packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-11700T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i7-11700T versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7533HS — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-11700T (base: 1.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-11700T uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7533HS uses Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-11700T scores 15,393 against the Ryzen 5 7533HS's 15,231 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-11700T. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i7-11700T | Ryzen 5 7533HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+5% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.4 GHz | 3.3 GHz+136% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 6 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake (2021) | Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 15,393+1% | 15,231 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,497 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-11700T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 7533HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-11700T | Ryzen 5 7533HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-11700T) / not specified (Ryzen 5 7533HS). The Core i7-11700T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 750), while the Ryzen 5 7533HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-11700T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-11700T rivals Ryzen 7 5700G.
| Feature | Core i7-11700T | Ryzen 5 7533HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 750 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Low Power Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












