
Core i7-11600H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7533HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-11600H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics, while Ryzen 5 7533HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1787 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7533HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 7533HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1787 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-11600H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,231 vs 15,441).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11600H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-11600H
2021Ryzen 5 7533HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics, while Ryzen 5 7533HS needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1787 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1787 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7533HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-11600H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,231 vs 15,441).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11600H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-11600H better than Ryzen 5 7533HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-11600H | Ryzen 5 7533HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-11600H | Ryzen 5 7533HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 347 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 142 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-11600H | Ryzen 5 7533HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 381 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 381 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 381 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 361 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 300 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 213 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-11600H | Ryzen 5 7533HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 381 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 381 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 381 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 381 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 381 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 344 FPS | 353 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-11600H and Ryzen 5 7533HS

Core i7-11600H
Core i7-11600H
The Core i7-11600H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake H45 (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,441 points. Launch price was $395.


Ryzen 5 7533HS
Ryzen 5 7533HS
The Ryzen 5 7533HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Setembro 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 15,231 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-11600H and Ryzen 5 7533HS share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i7-11600H versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7533HS — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-11600H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-11600H uses the Tiger Lake H45 (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen 5 7533HS uses Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-11600H scores 15,441 against the Ryzen 5 7533HS's 15,231 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i7-11600H. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i7-11600H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7533HS.
| Feature | Core i7-11600H | Ryzen 5 7533HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+5% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin | 6 nm-40% |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake H45 (2021) | Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 15,441+1% | 15,231 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,903 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-11600H uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 7533HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-11600H | Ryzen 5 7533HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1787 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-11600H) / not specified (Ryzen 5 7533HS). The Core i7-11600H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics), while the Ryzen 5 7533HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-11600H targets Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-11600H rivals Ryzen 5 5600H.
| Feature | Core i7-11600H | Ryzen 5 7533HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












