
Core Ultra 5 228V
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 6600U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 228V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc 130V, while Ryzen 5 6600U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,955 vs 16,992).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $295 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 6600U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen 5 6600U
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 17W, a 2W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 228V across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 228V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 5 228V
2024Ryzen 5 6600U
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc 130V, while Ryzen 5 6600U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 17W, a 2W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,955 vs 16,992).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $295 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 6600U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 228V across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 228V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 228V better than Ryzen 5 6600U?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 228V | Ryzen 5 6600U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 228V | Ryzen 5 6600U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 202 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 146 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 228V | Ryzen 5 6600U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 424 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 424 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 344 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 424 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 424 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 424 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 384 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 193 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 228V | Ryzen 5 6600U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 424 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 424 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 425 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 424 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 424 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 425 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 424 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 424 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 359 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 228V and Ryzen 5 6600U

Core Ultra 5 228V
Core Ultra 5 228V
The Core Ultra 5 228V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,955 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 6600U
Ryzen 5 6600U
The Ryzen 5 6600U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-U (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,992 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 228V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 6600U offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 5 228V has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 228V versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 6600U — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 228V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 5 6600U uses Rembrandt-U (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 228V scores 16,955 against the Ryzen 5 6600U's 16,992 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 6600U. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 228V vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 6600U.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 228V | Ryzen 5 6600U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.9 GHz+38% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB (per core)+400% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-50% | 6 nm |
| Architecture | Lunar Lake (2024) | Rembrandt-U (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 16,955 | 16,992 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,932 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,585 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,053 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 228V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 6600U uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 228V | Ryzen 5 6600U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2833 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5X-8533 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core Ultra 5 228V) / not specified (Ryzen 5 6600U). The Core Ultra 5 228V includes integrated graphics (Arc 130V), while the Ryzen 5 6600U requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 228V | Ryzen 5 6600U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Arc 130V | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











