
Core i9-10980HK
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 6600U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-10980HK
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 6600U moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 6600U
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10980HK across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,992 vs 17,037).
Core i9-10980HK
2020Ryzen 5 6600U
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 6600U moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10980HK across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,992 vs 17,037).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-10980HK better than Ryzen 5 6600U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-10980HK | Ryzen 5 6600U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-10980HK | Ryzen 5 6600U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 312 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 273 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 202 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 232 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 146 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-10980HK | Ryzen 5 6600U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 426 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 344 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 426 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 426 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 393 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 193 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-10980HK | Ryzen 5 6600U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 426 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 425 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 426 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 425 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 426 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 359 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10980HK and Ryzen 5 6600U

Core i9-10980HK
Core i9-10980HK
The Core i9-10980HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,037 points. Launch price was $583.


Ryzen 5 6600U
Ryzen 5 6600U
The Ryzen 5 6600U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-U (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,992 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10980HK packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 6600U offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-10980HK has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10980HK versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 6600U — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Core i9-10980HK (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i9-10980HK uses the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 6600U uses Rembrandt-U (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10980HK scores 17,037 against the Ryzen 5 6600U's 16,992 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i9-10980HK. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i9-10980HK | Ryzen 5 6600U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+13% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.9 GHz+21% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 6 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-H (2020) | Rembrandt-U (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 17,037 | 16,992 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10980HK uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 6600U uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-10980HK | Ryzen 5 6600U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











