
Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 6600HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE
2024Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 6600HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,945 vs 18,975).
Ryzen 5 6600HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE
2024Ryzen 5 6600HS
2022Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 6600HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,945 vs 18,975).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 6600HS better than Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE | Ryzen 5 6600HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE | Ryzen 5 6600HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 146 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE | Ryzen 5 6600HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 344 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 399 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 227 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 193 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE | Ryzen 5 6600HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 474 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 474 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 474 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 420 FPS | 474 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 443 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 390 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 347 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 364 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE and Ryzen 5 6600HS


Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE
Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE
The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE is manufactured by AMD. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,945 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 6600HS
Ryzen 5 6600HS
The Ryzen 5 6600HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,975 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 6600HS is built on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE scores 18,945 against the Ryzen 5 6600HS's 18,975 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 6600HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE | Ryzen 5 6600HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | — | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | — | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | — | 512K (per core) |
| Process | — | 6 nm |
| Architecture | — | Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 18,945 | 18,975 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 6600HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE | Ryzen 5 6600HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












