
Core i9-10900T
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5625U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-10900T
2020Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 5 5625U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $120 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 5625U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
Ryzen 5 5625U
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,717 vs 14,727).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-10900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i9-10900T
2020Ryzen 5 5625U
2022Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 5 5625U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $120 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 5625U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,717 vs 14,727).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-10900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-10900T better than Ryzen 5 5625U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-10900T | Ryzen 5 5625U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-10900T | Ryzen 5 5625U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 242 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 247 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 158 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-10900T | Ryzen 5 5625U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 368 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 368 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 340 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 191 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-10900T | Ryzen 5 5625U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 368 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 368 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 365 FPS |
| ultra | 368 FPS | 315 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10900T and Ryzen 5 5625U

Core i9-10900T
Core i9-10900T
The Core i9-10900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 14,727 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 5 5625U
Ryzen 5 5625U
The Ryzen 5 5625U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,717 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10900T packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5625U offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-10900T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i9-10900T versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5625U — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900T (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5625U is built on the Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i9-10900T scores 14,727 against the Ryzen 5 5625U's 14,717 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i9-10900T. L3 cache: 20 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i9-10900T vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5625U.
| Feature | Core i9-10900T | Ryzen 5 5625U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+7% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.9 GHz | 2.3 GHz+21% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB Intel® Smart Cache+25% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | — | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | — | Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 14,727 | 14,717 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,710 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,476 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10900T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 5625U uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-10900T | Ryzen 5 5625U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i9-10900T) / not specified (Ryzen 5 5625U). The Core i9-10900T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 5 5625U requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i9-10900T | Ryzen 5 5625U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












