
Core i7-6900K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5625U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-6900K
2016Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,682 vs 14,717).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,089 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 5625U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌833.3% higher power demand at 140W vs 15W.
Ryzen 5 5625U
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 140W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
Core i7-6900K
2016Ryzen 5 5625U
2022Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 140W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,682 vs 14,717).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,089 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 5625U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌833.3% higher power demand at 140W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5625U better than Core i7-6900K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-6900K | Ryzen 5 5625U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-6900K | Ryzen 5 5625U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 230 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 168 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 158 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-6900K | Ryzen 5 5625U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 367 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 367 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 367 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 367 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 361 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 191 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-6900K | Ryzen 5 5625U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 367 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 367 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 367 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 367 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 367 FPS | 365 FPS |
| ultra | 367 FPS | 315 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-6900K and Ryzen 5 5625U

Core i7-6900K
Core i7-6900K
The Core i7-6900K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-E (2016) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,682 points. Launch price was $1,020.


Ryzen 5 5625U
Ryzen 5 5625U
The Ryzen 5 5625U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,717 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-6900K packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5625U offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-6900K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-6900K versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5625U — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5625U (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i7-6900K uses the Broadwell-E (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5625U uses Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6900K scores 14,682 against the Ryzen 5 5625U's 14,717 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 5625U. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i7-6900K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5625U.
| Feature | Core i7-6900K | Ryzen 5 5625U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4.3 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+39% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+25% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Broadwell-E (2016) | Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 14,682 | 14,717 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,273 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,591 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-6900K uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 5625U uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-6900K | Ryzen 5 5625U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-6900K) / not specified (Ryzen 5 5625U). Primary use case: Core i7-6900K targets High-End Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-6900K | Ryzen 5 5625U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | High-End Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











