Core i7-6900K vs Ryzen 5 5625U

Intel

Core i7-6900K

8 Cores16 Thrd140 WWMax: 4 GHz2016

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 5625U

6 Cores12 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2022

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-6900K

2016

Why buy it

  • +25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (14,682 vs 14,717).
  • Launch MSRP is still $1,089 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 5625U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 833.3% higher power demand at 140W vs 15W.

Ryzen 5 5625U

2022

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 140W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 5625U better than Core i7-6900K?
Yes. Ryzen 5 5625U is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 5625U is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 2.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 5625U is the better fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 5625U is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. Ryzen 5 5625U is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,089 MSRP, and it gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-6900K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that is mostly used-market pricing on an obsolete 2016 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (13.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a very cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA2011.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 5625U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i7-6900KRyzen 5 5625U
1080p
low173 FPS172 FPS
medium139 FPS146 FPS
high113 FPS118 FPS
ultra90 FPS97 FPS
1440p
low144 FPS147 FPS
medium113 FPS123 FPS
high90 FPS99 FPS
ultra71 FPS81 FPS
4K
low66 FPS78 FPS
medium55 FPS71 FPS
high44 FPS56 FPS
ultra35 FPS44 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i7-6900KRyzen 5 5625U
1080p
low367 FPS318 FPS
medium329 FPS276 FPS
high274 FPS249 FPS
ultra230 FPS216 FPS
1440p
low329 FPS282 FPS
medium291 FPS250 FPS
high243 FPS229 FPS
ultra202 FPS197 FPS
4K
low212 FPS222 FPS
medium189 FPS200 FPS
high168 FPS186 FPS
ultra138 FPS158 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i7-6900KRyzen 5 5625U
1080p
low367 FPS368 FPS
medium367 FPS368 FPS
high367 FPS368 FPS
ultra367 FPS368 FPS
1440p
low367 FPS368 FPS
medium367 FPS368 FPS
high367 FPS360 FPS
ultra367 FPS299 FPS
4K
low367 FPS338 FPS
medium367 FPS284 FPS
high361 FPS247 FPS
ultra295 FPS191 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i7-6900KRyzen 5 5625U
1080p
low367 FPS368 FPS
medium367 FPS368 FPS
high367 FPS368 FPS
ultra367 FPS368 FPS
1440p
low367 FPS368 FPS
medium367 FPS368 FPS
high367 FPS368 FPS
ultra367 FPS368 FPS
4K
low367 FPS368 FPS
medium367 FPS368 FPS
high367 FPS365 FPS
ultra367 FPS315 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-6900K and Ryzen 5 5625U

Intel

Core i7-6900K

The Core i7-6900K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-E (2016) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,682 points. Launch price was $1,020.

AMD

Ryzen 5 5625U

The Ryzen 5 5625U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,717 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i7-6900K packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5625U offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-6900K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-6900K versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5625U — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5625U (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i7-6900K uses the Broadwell-E (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5625U uses Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6900K scores 14,682 against the Ryzen 5 5625U's 14,717 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 5625U. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i7-6900K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5625U.

FeatureCore i7-6900KRyzen 5 5625U
Cores / Threads
8 / 16+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4 GHz
4.3 GHz+7%
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+39%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)+25%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
7 nm-50%
Architecture
Broadwell-E (2016)
Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023)
PassMark
14,682
14,717
Geekbench 6 Single
1,273
Geekbench 6 Multi
7,591
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-6900K uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 5625U uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-6900KRyzen 5 5625U
Socket
LGA2011
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-6900K) / not specified (Ryzen 5 5625U). Primary use case: Core i7-6900K targets High-End Desktop.

FeatureCore i7-6900KRyzen 5 5625U
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
High-End Desktop