
Core i9-9820X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-9820X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅83.3% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.0 vs 145.1 PassMark/$ ($889 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 5600GT can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600GT.
Ryzen 5 5600GT
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $749 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $889 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 530.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 145.1 vs 23.0 PassMark/$ ($140 MSRP vs $889 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 7, while Core i9-9820X needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Core i9-9820X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9820X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,300 vs 9,361).
Core i9-9820X
2018Ryzen 5 5600GT
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅83.3% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $749 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $889 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 530.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 145.1 vs 23.0 PassMark/$ ($140 MSRP vs $889 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 7, while Core i9-9820X needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Core i9-9820X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.0 vs 145.1 PassMark/$ ($889 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 5600GT can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600GT.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9820X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,300 vs 9,361).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-9820X better than Ryzen 5 5600GT?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-9820X | Ryzen 5 5600GT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-9820X | Ryzen 5 5600GT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 327 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 231 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 296 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 208 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 194 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 161 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-9820X | Ryzen 5 5600GT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 511 FPS | 508 FPS |
| high | 511 FPS | 502 FPS |
| ultra | 471 FPS | 418 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 482 FPS | 409 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 367 FPS | 308 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 340 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 252 FPS |
| ultra | 239 FPS | 194 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-9820X | Ryzen 5 5600GT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 511 FPS | 508 FPS |
| high | 511 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 511 FPS | 508 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 511 FPS | 508 FPS |
| high | 511 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 502 FPS | 492 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 480 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 367 FPS | 352 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-9820X and Ryzen 5 5600GT

Core i9-9820X
Core i9-9820X
The Core i9-9820X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 20,456 points. Launch price was $898.


Ryzen 5 5600GT
Ryzen 5 5600GT
The Ryzen 5 5600GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $140.
Processing Power
The Core i9-9820X packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600GT offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-9820X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i9-9820X versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600GT — a 9.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600GT (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i9-9820X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600GT uses Cezanne (2021−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9820X scores 20,456 against the Ryzen 5 5600GT's 20,312 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i9-9820X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,394 vs 2,000, a 35.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600GT that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,361 vs 9,300 (0.7% advantage for the Core i9-9820X). L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total) on the Core i9-9820X vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600GT.
| Feature | Core i9-9820X | Ryzen 5 5600GT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.6 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.6 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 16.5 MB (total)+3% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Cezanne (2021−2025) |
| PassMark | 20,456 | 20,312 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,394 | 2,000+43% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,361 | 9,300 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-9820X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600GT uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4 2666 MHz on the Core i9-9820X versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600GT — the Core i9-9820X supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 4 (Core i9-9820X) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 5600GT). PCIe lanes: 44 (Core i9-9820X) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600GT) — the Core i9-9820X offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel X299 (Core i9-9820X) and A520,B550,X570,B450,X470 (Ryzen 5 5600GT).
| Feature | Core i9-9820X | Ryzen 5 5600GT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4 2666 MHz | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 44+83% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Core i9-9820X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i9-9820X) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600GT). The Ryzen 5 5600GT includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 7), while the Core i9-9820X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-9820X targets Workstation, Ryzen 5 5600GT targets Budget Gaming/Desktop.
| Feature | Core i9-9820X | Ryzen 5 5600GT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Vega 7 |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Workstation | Budget Gaming/Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-9820X launched at $889 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600GT debuted at $140. On MSRP ($889 vs $140), the Ryzen 5 5600GT is $749 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-9820X delivers 23.0 pts/$ vs 145.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600GT — making the Ryzen 5 5600GT the 145.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-9820X | Ryzen 5 5600GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $889 | $140-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.0 | 145.1+531% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












