PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400T

2023

Why buy it

✅+19.7% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600GT across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 91.7 vs 145.1 PassMark/$ ($221 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).

Ryzen 5 5600GT

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $81 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
✅Delivers 58.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 145.1 vs 91.7 PassMark/$ ($140 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,300 vs 11,135).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13400T

2023

Ryzen 5 5600GT

2024

Why buy it

✅+19.7% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $81 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
✅Delivers 58.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 145.1 vs 91.7 PassMark/$ ($140 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600GT across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 91.7 vs 145.1 PassMark/$ ($221 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,300 vs 11,135).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400T better than Ryzen 5 5600GT?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 5 5600GT is ahead with a 3.3% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400T pulls ahead with 19.7% better Geekbench multi-core. Core i5-13400T also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400T is the better fit. You are getting 19.7% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400T is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 5600GT makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i5-13400T is 57.9% more expensive on MSRP at $221 MSRP versus $140 MSRP, and it gives you 19.7% better Geekbench multi-core. The trade-off is that Ryzen 5 5600GT is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.3% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 5600GT is also 58.2% better value on MSRP (145.1 vs 91.7 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 5 5600GT can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400T is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400T Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 5600GT Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400T	Ryzen 5 5600GT
1080p
low	170 FPS	178 FPS
medium	157 FPS	150 FPS
high	129 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	142 FPS	153 FPS
medium	123 FPS	125 FPS
high	98 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	84 FPS
4K
low	80 FPS	83 FPS
medium	74 FPS	74 FPS
high	59 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	46 FPS

Open Core i5-13400T Open Ryzen 5 5600GT

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400T	Ryzen 5 5600GT
1080p
low	289 FPS	360 FPS
medium	246 FPS	304 FPS
high	209 FPS	267 FPS
ultra	191 FPS	231 FPS
1440p
low	247 FPS	313 FPS
medium	218 FPS	271 FPS
high	190 FPS	245 FPS
ultra	165 FPS	208 FPS
4K
low	158 FPS	235 FPS
medium	141 FPS	207 FPS
high	132 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	161 FPS

Open Core i5-13400T Open Ryzen 5 5600GT

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400T	Ryzen 5 5600GT
1080p
low	507 FPS	508 FPS
medium	449 FPS	508 FPS
high	414 FPS	502 FPS
ultra	374 FPS	418 FPS
1440p
low	489 FPS	499 FPS
medium	420 FPS	409 FPS
high	380 FPS	369 FPS
ultra	341 FPS	308 FPS
4K
low	386 FPS	343 FPS
medium	326 FPS	291 FPS
high	291 FPS	252 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	194 FPS

Open Core i5-13400T Open Ryzen 5 5600GT

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400T	Ryzen 5 5600GT
1080p
low	507 FPS	508 FPS
medium	507 FPS	508 FPS
high	507 FPS	508 FPS
ultra	507 FPS	508 FPS
1440p
low	507 FPS	508 FPS
medium	507 FPS	508 FPS
high	507 FPS	508 FPS
ultra	472 FPS	492 FPS
4K
low	491 FPS	508 FPS
medium	449 FPS	459 FPS
high	395 FPS	407 FPS
ultra	345 FPS	352 FPS

Open Core i5-13400T Open Ryzen 5 5600GT

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400T and Ryzen 5 5600GT

Core i5-13400T

The Core i5-13400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,265 points. Launch price was $221.

Ryzen 5 5600GT

The Ryzen 5 5600GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $140.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400T packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600GT offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13400T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-13400T versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600GT — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600GT (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-13400T uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600GT uses Cezanne (2021−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400T scores 20,265 against the Ryzen 5 5600GT's 20,312 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600GT. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,364 vs 2,000, a 16.7% lead for the Core i5-13400T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,135 vs 9,300 (18% advantage for the Core i5-13400T). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400T vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600GT.

Feature	Core i5-13400T	Ryzen 5 5600GT
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+67%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.6 GHz+5%
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	3.6 GHz+177%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+25%	16 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Cezanne (2021−2025)
PassMark	20,265	20,312
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,094	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,364+18%	2,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,135+20%	9,300

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600GT uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-13400T versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600GT — the Core i5-13400T supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400T supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400T) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600GT) — the Ryzen 5 5600GT offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760,H770,Z690 (Core i5-13400T) and A520,B550,X570,B450,X470 (Ryzen 5 5600GT).

Feature	Core i5-13400T	Ryzen 5 5600GT
Socket	LGA1700	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	20	24+20%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 5600GT has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400T) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600GT). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Core i5-13400T) and Radeon Vega 7 (Ryzen 5 5600GT) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400T targets Energy Efficient Desktop, Ryzen 5 5600GT targets Budget Gaming/Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400T rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400T	Ryzen 5 5600GT
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 730	Radeon Vega 7
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Energy Efficient Desktop	Budget Gaming/Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400T launched at $221 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600GT debuted at $140. On MSRP ($221 vs $140), the Ryzen 5 5600GT is $81 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400T delivers 91.7 pts/$ vs 145.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600GT — making the Ryzen 5 5600GT the 45.1% better value option.