
EPYC 7252
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7252
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,311 vs 19,411).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7252, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $159 MSRP, while EPYC 7252 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
EPYC 7252
2019Ryzen 5 5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,311 vs 19,411).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7252, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $159 MSRP, while EPYC 7252 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5500 better than EPYC 7252?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7252 | Ryzen 5 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7252 | Ryzen 5 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 312 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 162 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7252 | Ryzen 5 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 483 FPS |
| medium | 485 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 453 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 397 FPS | 406 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 483 FPS |
| medium | 395 FPS | 411 FPS |
| high | 346 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 300 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 355 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 192 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7252 | Ryzen 5 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 483 FPS |
| medium | 485 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 485 FPS | 483 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 483 FPS |
| medium | 485 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 425 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 308 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7252 and Ryzen 5 5500

EPYC 7252
EPYC 7252
The EPYC 7252 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 19,411 points. Launch price was $475.


Ryzen 5 5500
Ryzen 5 5500
The Ryzen 5 5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,311 points. Launch price was $159.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7252 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5500 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 7252 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7252 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5500 — a 27% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5500 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 7252 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5500 uses Cezanne (2021−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7252 scores 19,411 against the Ryzen 5 5500's 19,311 — a 0.5% lead for the EPYC 7252. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7252 vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 5500.
| Feature | EPYC 7252 | Ryzen 5 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz+31% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.6 GHz+16% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Cezanne (2021−2025) |
| PassMark | 19,411 | 19,311 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7252 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 5500 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | EPYC 7252 | Ryzen 5 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 7252) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5500). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5500 targets Desktop.
| Feature | EPYC 7252 | Ryzen 5 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












